Coupling urban 3‐D information and circuit theory to advance the development of urban ecological networks

Fanhua Kong,Ding Wang,Haiwei Yin,Iryna Dronova,Fan Fei,Jiayu Chen,Yingxia Pu,Manchun Li

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.13682

IF: 7.563

2021-01-21

Conservation Biology

Abstract:<p>Ongoing, rapid urban growth accompanied by habitat fragmentation and loss challenges biodiversity conservation and leads to decreases in ecosystem services. Application of the concept of ecological networks in the preservation and restoration of connections among isolated patches of natural areas is a powerful conservation strategy. However, previous approaches often failed to objectively consider the impacts of complex 3‐D city environments on ecological niches. We used airborne lidar‐derived information on the 3‐D structure of the built environment and vegetation and detailed land use and cover data to characterize habitat quality, niche diversity, and human disturbance and to predict habitat connectivity among 38 identified habitat core areas (HCAs) in Nanjing, China. We used circuit theory and Linkage Mapper to create a landscape resistance layer, simulate habitat connectivity, and identify and prioritize important corridors. We mapped 64 links by using current flow centrality to evaluate each HCA's contribution and the links that facilitate intact connectivity. Values were highest for HCA links located in the west, south, and northeast of the study area, where natural forests with complex 3‐D structures predominate. Two smaller HCA areas had high centrality scores relative to their extents, which means they could act as important stepping stones in connectivity planning. The mapped pinch‐point regions had narrow and fragile links among the HCAs, suggesting they require special protection. The barriers with the highest impact scores were mainly located at the HCA connections to Purple Mountain and, based on these high scores, are more likely to indicate important locations that can be restored to improve potential connections. Our novel framework allowed us to sufficiently convey spatially explicit information to identify targets for habitat restoration and potential pathways for species movement and dispersal. Such information is critical for assessing existing or potential habitats and corridors and developing strategic plans to balance habitat conservation and other land uses based on scientifically informed connectivity planning and implementation.</p>

environmental sciences,biodiversity conservation,ecology

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The main problem that this paper attempts to solve is the negative impact of habitat fragmentation caused by rapid urban expansion and human activities on biodiversity and ecosystem service functions. Specifically, the author points out that traditional ecological network construction methods fail to fully consider the influence of the complex three - dimensional (3 - D) urban environment on ecological niches, resulting in inaccurate assessment of habitat connectivity.

### Main Problems
1. **Urban Expansion and Habitat Fragmentation**
- The rapid urbanization process is accompanied by habitat fragmentation and loss, which poses a challenge to biodiversity conservation and leads to the decline of ecosystem service functions.
- The remaining isolated habitats impede the spatial movement of species, interfere with landscape ecological processes and functions, and seriously hinder biodiversity conservation.

2. **Limitations of Traditional Methods**
- Previous studies mainly relied on low - resolution two - dimensional (2 - D) remote sensing data or land cover maps when assessing urban ecological connectivity. These data fail to fully reflect the impact of the urban three - dimensional structure on habitat quality, ecological niche diversity, and human interference.
- This limitation leads to inconsistency between the predicted habitat connectivity and the actual conservation effect.

### Solutions
To solve the above problems, the author proposes a new framework that combines circuit theory and three - dimensional information obtained from LiDAR (Light Detection and Ranging) to more realistically simulate urban ecological networks and identify high - priority habitat protection and corridor targets. The specific steps include:

1. **Data Acquisition and Processing**
- Use airborne LiDAR data to obtain detailed three - dimensional vegetation and building structure information.
- Combine land use and cover data sets, separate buildings and vegetation, and re - classify them into broad habitat categories.

2. **Habitat Evaluation Variables**
- Calculate six vegetation structure parameters (such as vegetation canopy height model, standard deviation of vegetation canopy height, etc.) as indicators of habitat quality and ecological niche diversity.
- Evaluate three - dimensional building density, volume, and traffic networks as potential indicators of human interference.

3. **Create Landscape Resistance Layers**
- Analyze the ecological integrity of the urban landscape and assign different resistance values according to habitat quality.
- Comprehensively consider vegetation structure parameters, three - dimensional building variables, and other land use types to generate the final resistance layer.

4. **Circuit Theory and Connectivity Modeling**
- Use the Linkage Mapper tool to simulate spatially explicit connections and identify priority habitats and barrier or bottleneck points.
- Evaluate the quality of each link by calculating cost - weighted distance (CWD), least - cost path (LCP), and current - flow centrality.

### Research Significance
This study provides a new methodological framework that can more accurately assess the connectivity of urban ecosystems and provides an important basis for formulating scientific ecological protection plans. By combining three - dimensional structure information, the study not only improves the understanding of urban ecological networks but also provides guidance for future ecological restoration and corridor construction.

### Formula Explanation
- **Resistance Value Calculation Formula**
\[
R_G(B)=\frac{1}{n}\sum_{i = 1}^{n}R_{G(B)b}\times R_{G(B)c}
\]
where \(R_G(B)\) is the final resistance value of green space (or building) for each cell size; \(R_{G(B)c}\) is the resistance coefficient of green space (or building) classified according to three - dimensional vegetation and building structures; \(R_{G(B)b}\) is the base value of each type of green space (or building); \(n\) is the number of classified green space (or building) types.

- **Resistance Value Calculation Formula for Other Land Use Types**
\[
R_{Li}=\sum_{i = 1}^{n}R_{L(i)b}\times R_{L(i)c}
\]
where \(R_{Li}\) is the final resistance layer of all non - green space and building land use types; \(R_{L(i)c}\) is the resistance coefficient classified according to area and land use type; \(R_{L(i)b}\) is the base value of each land use type; \(n\) is further classified according to area and type.