Abstract:Purpose This cross-disciplinary, empirical study aims to examine the phenomenon of organizational opinion leadership. Extant research concerning social capital and both referent and expert power suggests that informal opinion leaders within an organizational setting have the ability to influence their co-workers. This study focuses on the transformational leadership characteristics of idealized influence-attributed (charisma) and -behavior (role modeling). The social exchange aspects of the opinion leader–seeker relationship process are examined through an application of dyadic concepts found within leader–member exchange (LMX) theory. This study examines potential outcomes of opinion leader influence, specifically, opinion-seeker perceived organizational support (POS), affective commitment and normative commitment. Design/methodology/approach This study examines the dynamics of organizational opinion leader (OOL)–organizational opinion seeker (OOS) relationship to determine whether OOLs influence OOSs through role modeling and charisma, captured through the idealized influence aspect of transformational leadership. The OOL–OOS relationship is examined through the lens of LMX, commonly used to examine supervisor–subordinate exchange relationships. This study also examines whether OOLs’ idealized influence and OOL–OOS exchange relationships are related to OOSs’ perceived organizational support (POS) and both affective and normative commitment, and whether POS mediates their influence. Hypotheses are offered and survey data collected from a heterogeneous sample of 646 individuals is examined using structural equation modeling. Findings The results suggest that idealized influence consistently positively influences the outcomes. LMX-affect, -loyalty and -professional respect influence OOS perceptions of POS. Idealized influence and POS influence OOS affective and normative commitment. LMX-affect influences OOS affective and normative commitment, while LMX-loyalty influences normative commitment. LMX-professional respect slightly influenced OOS affective commitment negatively, suggesting that respect does not engender positive feelings and had no influence on normative commitment. Research limitations/implications This interdisciplinary study integrates concepts found within marketing, political science and organizational literature works to shed new light on the informal influence organizational members have on one another, which furthers our understanding of both shared leadership and opinion leadership. This research provides another frame for the concept of shared leadership, suggesting that OOL influence occurs horizontally and vertically within organizations. The overall findings suggest that both the characteristics of opinion leaders and the quality of OOL–OOS relationships matter. Practical implications This research highlights the importance of recognizing and enabling organizational members whose opinions are sought by their peers. Organizational opinion leadership exists within organization and influences organizational members’ attitudes and perceptions. Therefore, it is a necessity that organizations understand the phenomenon and guide it, much as organizational culture is guided, so that it produces positive organizational outcomes. Originality/value Very little research exists concerning organizational opinion leadership. This study breaks new ground by developing theory, applying accepted constructs to the phenomenon and empirically testing the impact of opinion leadership.

The Triangle of Leadership. Authenticity, Competence and Ordinariness in Political Marketing

Authentic Leadership and Taking Charge Behavior: A Moderated Mediation Model of Psychological Capital and Occupational Calling

Loving our leaders: A triangular theory of love for political figures

Organizational opinion leader charisma, rolemodeling, and relationships

Positioning a Personal Political Brand on YouTube with Points of Different Visual Storytelling

The Perspective Makes the Leader: The Camera Perspective in a Leader Photograph Shapes Their Charismatic Effect and Observers’ Approval

President Obama's Humble Face: An Authentic or a Socially Desirable Posturing? A Study on Reactions to Obama's Autobiographical Self-Disclosures

Building Trust in Political Office: Testing the Efficacy of Political Contact and Authentic Communication

The 4Ps Marketing Strategy as a Driver of Dynamic Capabilities: Path to Consumer/Voter Satisfaction

‘Leadership’ as a Project: Neoliberalism and the Proliferation of ‘Leaders’

Red Tsars and Iron Ladies: Exploring the role of marketing forces in the construction of political heroism

Politics as Art: The Creation of a Successful Political Brand

Leader, “know yourself”: bringing back self-awareness, trust and feedback with a theory O perspective

Charisma in the 1952 Campaign

Influencer marketing effectiveness: the mechanisms that matter

Attractiveness, trustworthiness and expertise – social influencers’ winning formula?

How do strategic leaders engage with social media? A theoretical framework for research and practice

Savvy or Slimy Upward Influence: The Unintended Effects of Perceived Political Culture and Tactics on Employee Perceptions of Leader Trustworthiness

Characteristics of the Opinion Leader: A New Dimension

Networked political brands: consumption, community and political expression in contemporary brand culture