Abstract:The world, as a global village, is currently taking part in a real-time public health, medical, socio-cultural, and economic experiment on how best to combat the COVID-19 pandemic. Extraordinary times demand extraordinary measures. Depending on the time from the outbreak, strategies have ranged from minimal intervention to mitigation by quarantine for high-risk groups (elderly with chronic illnesses) to containment and lockdown. Adherence to such restrictions have depended on the individual and national psyche and culture. One can understand and forgive governments for being over-cautious, but not for being ill-prepared. It seems that Singapore after SARS (2003) and South Korea after MERS (2015) learnt from their experiences and have fared relatively well with minimal disruption to daily routines. Coping with the challenge of COVID-19 is an urgent global task. We use the Sociotype ecological framework to analyze different coping responses at three levels: Context (government and leadership, social context, health services, and media); Relationships; and the Individual. We describe the many negative outcomes (e.g. mortality [obviously], unemployment, economic damage, food insecurity, threat to democracy, claustrophobia) and the positive ones (e.g. new, remote teaching, working, and medical routines; social bonding and solidarity; redefining existential values and priorities) of this surreal situation, which is still evolving. We highlight the importance of humor in stress reduction. Regular and reliable communication to the public has to be improved, acknowledging incomplete data, and learning to deal with fake news, misinformation, and conspiracy theories. Excess mortality is the preferred statistic to follow and compare outcomes. When the health risks are over, the economic recovery responses will vary according to the financial state of countries. If world order is to be reshaped, then a massive economic aid plan should be launched by the rich countries-akin to the Marshall plan after the Second World War. It should be led preferably by the USA and China. The results of the tradeoffs between health and economic lockdowns will only become apparent in the months to come. The experiences and lessons learned from this emergency should be used as a rehearsal for the next epi-/pandemic, which will surely take place in the foreseeable future.

Our Collective Tensions: Paradox Research Community’s Response to COVID-19

Community, work, and family in times of COVID-19

The Pandemic Paradox in International Law

Paradox Research in Management Science: Looking Back to Move Forward

A Journal of the COVID-19 (Plague) Year

COVID‐19 and the Future of Management Studies. Insights from Leading Scholars

Psychological, Behavioral, and Interpersonal Effects and Clinical Implications for Health Systems of the Coronavirus (COVID-19) Pandemic: A Call for Research

Multifaceted COVID-19 Outbreak

In COVID Times: Scholars of Health and Medicine Meet Disaster Studies

Social psychology and COVID-19: What the field can tell us about behavior in a pandemic

Forum: COVID-19 Dispatches

Comparative Public Policy Analysis of COVID-19 As a Naturally Occurring Experiment

Collaborating in the Time of COVID-19: The Scope and Scale of Innovative Responses to a Global Pandemic

Collaboration in the Time of COVID: A Scientometric Analysis of Multidisciplinary SARS-CoV-2 Research

Leading through paradox in a COVID‐19 world: Human resources comes of age

Using social and behavioural science to support COVID-19 pandemic response

Suppressing the Crisis: Moral Panics, Emerging Infectious Diseases, and the COVID-19 Conjuncture

Threading a decolonial feminist response to COVID-19: One community psychologist's reflection on the assemblages of violence

Coping with the Challenges of COVID-19 Using the Sociotype Framework: A Rehearsal for the Next Pandemic

Positive psychology in a pandemic: buffering, bolstering, and building mental health

Coping with COVID-19: Insights from cognition and emotion research