Bilayer CIGS-based solar cell device for enhanced performance: a numerical approach

R. Prasad,A. K. Das,Udai P. Singh
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00339-021-04298-y
2021-01-24
Applied Physics A
Abstract:A numerical simulation of a single-junction bilayer of CIGS-based solar cell tandem device is presented in this paper. The structure used here is Al:ZnO/CdS/CuIn<sub>1-X</sub>Ga<sub>X</sub>Se<sub>2</sub>/CuIn<sub>1-Y</sub>Ga<sub>Y</sub>Se<sub>2</sub>, and the software used is wx-AMPS. As most of the efficient high-performance photovoltaic devices are strongly dependent upon Ga content, the variation of Ga ratio is a necessary approach in the investigation of CIGS solar cells. As a result, different Ga grading profiles have been demonstrated and thoroughly analyzed the different solar cell parameters viz. open-circuit voltage (<i>V</i><sub>oc</sub>), short-circuit current density(<i>J</i><sub>sc</sub>), fill factor, external quantum efficiency and efficiency (<i>η</i>) of the above structure under AM 1.5 illumination. At an initial process, we analyzed the single layer of CIGS (CuIn<sub>0.69</sub>Ga<sub>0.31</sub>Se<sub>2</sub>) solar cell device and its output characteristics. In the second step, we have shown the impact of tandem structure with the addition of a second CIGS absorber layer with different Ga concentrations and its improved performance as compared with a single absorber layer device. We also proposed for the first time a solution to the issue of diffusion (unintentional Ga grading) which occurs at the time of annealing at higher temperatures by adding a p-type MoS<sub>2</sub> layer in between the bilayer CIGS to limit the diffusion and to achieve the proposed grading. The efficiency of the bilayer device structure with fixed Ga fraction <i>x</i> = (0.31) of the top absorber layer along with Ga fraction <i>y</i> = (0.45) of the bottom absorber layer shows the improved efficiency from 20.56% (single layer) to 23.6% (bilayer). Addition of a <i>p</i>-type MoS<sub>2</sub> layer in between the bilayer CIGS further improves the efficiency from 23.6 to 24.17%.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?