Abstract:Sarah Cook, 1 David Osborn, 2, 3 Arti Maini, 1 Ravi Parekh, 1 Shamini Gnani, 1 Thomas Beaney, 1 Ana Luisa Neves, 1 Sonia Saxena, 1 Jennifer K Quint 1 1 School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK; 2 Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK; 3 Camden and Islington NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK Correspondence: Sarah Cook, White City Campus, Imperial College London, 9th Floor Michael Uren Building, London, W12 0BZ, UK, Email Purpose: Electronic health records (EHR) are valuable resources for health research; however, their use is challenging. A validated alcohol use disorder (AUD) codelist for UK primary care is needed to improve population-based research in this patient group. We aimed to develop an AUD codelist for use in the Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) Aurum database, a UK EHR primary-care database. Methods: The CPRD code browser was searched using keywords related to alcohol use using a previously developed search strategy. The resulting codes were categorised as AUD if they were: a) diagnostic of AUD, b) indicated alcohol withdrawal, or c) indicated chronic alcohol-related harm (physical or mental). Codes related to alcohol use but not used to define AUD were also classified into relevant categories (alcohol status, acute harm, and alcohol screening). All codes were categorised independently by at least two reviewers (one person reviewed all codes and five reviewers (all practising GPs) each reviewed a subset of codes (100– 200 codes each). Disagreements in categorisation were discussed by at least three coders and a consensus was reached. The reliability of categorisation was assessed using kappa statistics. Results: In total, 556 potential codes related to alcohol use were identified. The Kappa for reliability between coders was moderate for both AUD (0.72) and across all categories (0.62), with substantial variability between coders (AUD: 0.33– 0.97; all categories 0.36– 0.74). In the final codelist, 138 codes were included as indicating AUD: 38 codes identified which indicated diagnosis of AUD, 14 indicating withdrawal plus 85 codes indicating chronic alcohol-related harm (41 physical health and 44 mental health). Conclusion: Many codes are used in primary care to record alcohol use and associated harms, and there is substantial variability in how clinicians categorise them. While future work formally validating the codelist against gold standard clinical reviews and qualitative work with General Practitioners is needed for a deeper understanding of coding processes, we have documented here the process used for the development of an AUD codelist within primary care which can be used as a reference for future research. Keywords: alcohol use disorder, electronic health records, primary care, clinical practice research datalink Electronic Health Records (EHR) are a valuable resource for health research, as a source of data on medical diagnoses and treatments for a very large number of people, however their use comes with challenges. While increasingly large amounts of data collected during clinical consultations are available for health research, these data are not collected for research purposes and are subject to variation in coding practices among clinicians. 1 This can lead to issues such as measurement error and high levels of missing data. Alcohol-related harm has substantial implications both for the health of individuals and for society more broadly. Alcohol use was ranked as the seventh leading risk factor for premature mortality and disability globally in 2016 and the leading risk factor for risk-attributable disease burden in people aged 15–49 years. 2 A recent study from the Institute of Alcohol Studies estimated the annual economic cost of alcohol-related harm in England is £27.44 billion. 3 Alcohol Use Disorder (AUD) is an umbrella term that encompasses alcohol dependence and harmful use of alcohol. AUD can lead to a range of negative impacts including psychological, physical and social harms. People with AUD have substantially higher mortality compared with the general population with estimates ranging from two to four times higher risk. 4 AUD is linked to health inequalities 5,6 and people with AUD experience a high burden of comorbidities, including other mental health comorbidities. 7 Previous research has been conducted on the coding of alcohol screening 8 and alcohol intake 9 within UK primary care EHR data. This showed there were low levels of recording of alcohol use within primary care with only 50% of 1.8 million patients having a re -Abstract Truncated-

Administrative Coding in Electronic Health Care Record‐Based Research of NAFLD: An Expert Panel Consensus Statement

The future of International Classification of Diseases coding in steatotic liver disease: An expert panel Delphi consensus statement

Development and Validation of an Algorithm to Identify Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease in the Electronic Medical Record

Multisystem Health Comorbidity Networks of Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease: Phenome-Wide Mendelian Randomization and Disease-Trajectory Analyses

Electronic Medical Records for Discovery Research in Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease

Clinical guidelines of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: A systematic review.

Evaluating the coding accuracy of type 2 diabetes mellitus among patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease

A multisociety Delphi consensus statement on new fatty liver disease nomenclature

Safety-Net Primary Care and Endocrinology Clinicians' Knowledge and Perspectives on Screening for Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease: A Mixed-Methods Evaluation

Validation of a hierarchical algorithm to define chronic liver disease and cirrhosis etiology in administrative healthcare data

Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Diseases

National study of NAFLD management identifies variation in delivery of care in the UK between 2019 to 2022

Advancing the global public health agenda for NAFLD: a consensus statement

Validating new coding algorithms to improve identification of alcohol-associated and nonalcohol-associated cirrhosis hospitalizations in administrative databases

Reliability of histologic assessment for NAFLD and development of an expanded NAFLD activity score

Using An Electronic Medical Records Database To Identify Non-Traditional Cardiovascular Risk Factors In Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease

Identification of High-Risk Patients With Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease in Endocrinology Clinics

Recent advances in NAFLD: current areas of contention

Recording of Alcohol Use Disorder in Electronic Health Records: Developing a Recommended Codelist for Research

Association of Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease with Chronic Kidney Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Clinical cohort of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in a primary care setting