Evaluation of a Commercial Culture-free Neutralization Antibody Detection Kit for Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome-Related Coronavirus-2 and Comparison with an Anti-RBD ELISA Assay

Jesse Papenburg,Matthew P. Cheng,Rachel Corsini,Chelsea Caya,Emelissa Mendoza,Kathy Manguiat,L. Robbin Lindsay,Heidi Wood,Michael A. Drebot,Antonia Dibernardo,Gerasimos Zaharatos,Reneée Bazin,Romain Gasser,Mehdi Benlarbi,Gabrielle Gendron-Lepage,Guillaume Beaudoin-Bussières,Jérémie Prévost,Andrés Finzi,Momar Ndao,Cedric P Yansouni
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.01.23.21250325
2021-01-26
Abstract:ABSTRACT Background SARS-CoV-2 surrogate neutralization assays that obviate the need for viral culture offer substantial advantages regarding throughput and cost. The cPass SARS-CoV-2 Neutralization Antibody Detection Kit (Genscript) is the first such commercially available assay, detecting antibodies that block RBD/ACE-2 interaction. We aimed to evaluate cPass to inform its use and assess its added value compared to anti-RBD ELISA assays. Methods Serum reference panels comprising 205 specimens were used to compare cPass to plaque-reduction neutralization test (PRNT) and a pseudotyped lentiviral neutralization (PLV) assay for detection of neutralizing antibodies. We assessed the correlation of cPass with an ELISA detecting anti-RBD IgG, IgM, and IgA antibodies at a single timepoint and across intervals from onset of symptoms of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Results Compared to PRNT-50, cPass sensitivity ranged from 77% - 100% and specificity was 95% - 100%. Sensitivity was also high compared to the pseudotyped lentiviral neutralization assay (93% [95%CI 85-97]), but specificity was lower (58% [95%CI 48-67]). Highest agreement between cPass and ELISA was for anti-RBD IgG ( r =0.823). Against the pseudotyped lentiviral neutralization assay, anti-RBD IgG sensitivity (99% [95%CI 94-100]) was very similar to that of cPass, but overall specificity was lower (37% [95%CI 28-47]). Against PRNT-50, results of cPass and anti-RBD IgG were nearly identical. Conclusions The added value of cPass compared to an IgG anti-RBD ELISA was modest.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?