Metagenomic evidence for co-occurrence of antibiotic, biocide and metal resistance genes in pigs

Xuanji Li,Christopher Rensing,Gisle Vestergaard,Joseph Nesme,Shashank Gupta,Manimozhiyan Arumugam,Asker Daniel Brejnrod,Søren Johannes Sørensen
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.01.26.428250
2021-01-27
Abstract:Abstract Antibiotic-resistant pathogens constitute an escalating public health concern. Hence a better understanding of the underlying processes responsible for this expansion is urgently needed. Co-selection of heavy metals/biocides and antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs) has been suggested as one potential mechanism promoting the proliferation of antimicrobial resistance (AMR). This paper aims to elucidate this interplay and exploit differences in antibiotic usage to infer patterns of co-selection by the non-antibiotic factors metals and biocides in the context of pig farming. We examined 278 gut metagenomes from pigs with continuous antibiotic exposure, only at weaning and at no exposure. Metals as growth promoters and biocides as disinfectants are currently used with little restrictions in stock farming. The pigs under continuous antibiotic exposure displayed the highest co-occurrence of ARGs and other genetic elements while the pigs under limited use of antibiotics still showed abundant co-occurrences. Pathogens belonging to Enterobacteriaceae displayed increased co-occurrence phenomena, suggesting that this maintenance is not a random selection process from a mobilized pool but pertains to specific phylogenetic clades. These results suggest that metals and biocides displayed strong selective pressures on ARGs exerted by intensive farming, regardless of the current use of antibiotics. Highlights A comprehensive gut microbiome metagenomics analysis of 278 pigs Co-selection phenomena were investigated via co-occurrence patterns as a proxy Twenty-seven types of co-occurrences involving 131 resistance genes were detected Regardless of use of antibiotics, AMR can be maintained by co-occurrence with MRGs/BRGs Maintenance of AMR is not a random selection process but pertains to specific phylogenetic clades
What problem does this paper attempt to address?