Abstract:The capacity to collect and analyse data is growing exponentially. Referred to as ‘Big Data’, this scientific, social and technological trend has helped create destabilising amounts of information, which can challenge accepted social and ethical norms. Big Data remains a fuzzy idea, emerging across social, scientific, and business contexts sometimes seemingly related only by the gigantic size of the datasets being considered. As is often the case with the cutting edge of scientific and technological progress, understanding of the ethical implications of Big Data lags behind. In order to bridge such a gap, this article systematically and comprehensively analyses academic literature concerning the ethical implications of Big Data, providing a watershed for future ethical investigations and regulations. Particular attention is paid to biomedical Big Data due to the inherent sensitivity of medical information. By means of a meta-analysis of the literature, a thematic narrative is provided to guide ethicists, data scientists, regulators and other stakeholders through what is already known or hypothesised about the ethical risks of this emerging and innovative phenomenon. Five key areas of concern are identified: (1) informed consent, (2) privacy (including anonymisation and data protection), (3) ownership, (4) epistemology and objectivity, and (5) ‘Big Data Divides’ created between those who have or lack the necessary resources to analyse increasingly large datasets. Critical gaps in the treatment of these themes are identified with suggestions for future research. Six additional areas of concern are then suggested which, although related have not yet attracted extensive debate in the existing literature. It is argued that they will require much closer scrutiny in the immediate future: (6) the dangers of ignoring group-level ethical harms; (7) the importance of epistemology in assessing the ethics of Big Data; (8) the changing nature of fiduciary relationships that become increasingly data saturated; (9) the need to distinguish between ‘academic’ and ‘commercial’ Big Data practices in terms of potential harm to data subjects; (10) future problems with ownership of intellectual property generated from analysis of aggregated datasets; and (11) the difficulty of providing meaningful access rights to individual data subjects that lack necessary resources. Considered together, these eleven themes provide a thorough critical framework to guide ethical assessment and governance of emerging Big Data practices.

Digital phenotyping and sensitive health data: Implications for data governance

Biomedical Big Data: New Models of Control Over Access, Use and Governance

Digital Biomarkers in Psychiatric Research: Data Protection Qualifications in a Complex Ecosystem

Digital tools against COVID-19: Framing the ethical challenges and how to address them

Digital phenotyping: how it could change mental health care and why we should all keep up

Big Data Analytics, Infectious Diseases and Associated Ethical Impacts

Using Big Data Tools to Analyze Digital Footprint in the COVID-19 Pandemic: Some Public Health Ethics Considerations

Big data, artificial intelligence and ethics

A Survey on Big Data-Driven Digital Phenotyping of Mental Health.

Treating medical data as a durable asset

Who Owns the Data? Open Data for Healthcare

Physiological Data: Challenges for Privacy and Ethics

How to use relevant data for maximal benefit with minimal risk: digital health data governance to protect vulnerable populations in low-income and middle-income countries

The ethical challenges of personalized digital health

Transforming Scientific Inquiry: Tapping Into Digital Data by Building a Culture of Transparency and Consent

The Ethics of Big Data: Current and Foreseeable Issues in Biomedical Contexts

We need to think about data governance for dementia research in a digital era

Privacy in the age of medical big data

Health Policy and Privacy Challenges Associated With Digital Technology

Citizen data sovereignty is key to wearables and wellness data reuse for the common good

Short-circuiting biology: Digital phenotypes, digital biomarkers, and shifting gazes in psychiatry