Abstract:The aim of the present study was to compare the clinical outcomes of conventional corneal collagen cross-linking (CXL) and pulsed-light accelerated CXL (pl-ACXL) in the eyes of patients with progressive keratoconus. A total of 72 eyes with progressive keratoconus in 58 patients were equally divided into the CXL and pl-ACXL treatment groups. The CXL treatment was performed using the UVX 1000 system with 0.1% riboflavin solution in 20% dextran presoak for 30 min, and 3 mW/cm2 ultraviolet A (UVA) light for 30 min. The pl-ACXL group was treated with the KXL system using 0.1% riboflavin with HPMC presoak for 10 min, followed by 8 min (1 sec on/1 sec off) of 30 mW/cm2 UVA light. Patients were evaluated according to the uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), corrected DVA (CDVA), refraction, maximum keratometry (Kmax), endothelial cell density (ECD), anterior segment optical coherence tomography and in vivo confocal microscopy. The follow-up period was 12 months. Transient haze was observed in 17 eyes (47.22%) in the CXL group and 8 eyes (22.22%) in the pl-ACXL group at 1 month postoperatively. There were no significant postoperative differences in the astigmatism, manifest refraction spherical equivalent, ECD or thinnest corneal thickness. By contrast, UDVA, CDVA and Kmax presented significant improvement at 12 months postoperatively in the two groups. The demarcation line depth was 284.94±33.29 µm in the CXL group, which was significantly deeper in comparison with that in the pl-ACXL group (201.64±27.72 µm; P<0.01) at 1 month postoperatively. In vivo confocal microscopy revealed keratocyte apoptosis and stromal edema at 1 month postoperatively, which gradually recovered towards the normal status after 12 months in the two groups. There were no apparent changes in the posterior stroma and endothelium in either group. The results of the present study revealed that CXL and pl-ACXL were safe and effective procedures in stabilizing the progression of keratoconus. The CXL technique offers more effective visual and topographic outcomes compared with pl-ACXL, while pl-ACXL ensures shorter treatment time and reduced microstructural damage.

Topographic Outcomes in Keratoconus Surgery: Epi-on versus Epi-off Iontophoresis Corneal Collagen Cross-Linking

Comparison of Deep Anterior Lamellar Keratoplasty and Corneal Cross-Linking in Patients with Advanced Keratoconus.

Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Customized Corneal Crosslinking: Epi-on in High Oxygen and Epi-off in Room Air for Keratoconus

Preliminary Characterization of Predictive Factors of the Visual Change after Epi-On and Epi-Off Corneal Collagen Crosslinking Techniques

New perspectives in keratoconus treatment: an update on iontophoresis-assisted corneal collagen crosslinking

Accelerated (45 Mw/cm2) Transepithelial Corneal Cross-Linking for Progressive Keratoconus Patients: Long-Term Topographical and Clinical Outcomes.

Evaluating the safety and efficacy of epi-off corneal cross-linking in patients with thin corneas due to keratectasia

Long-term study of topographic changes following pulsed accelerated corneal collagen cross-linking in progressive keratoconus

Conventional and Transepithelial Corneal Cross-Linking for Patients with Keratoconus.

134: THE EFFECTIVENESS OF CXL IN THE TREATMENT OF KERATOCONUS

Transepithelial Accelerated Corneal Collagen Cross-Linking with Higher Oxygen Availability for Keratoconus: 1-Year Results

One-year Outcomes of Pachymetry and Epithelium Thicknesses after Accelerated (45 Mw/cm2) Transepithelial Corneal Collagen Cross-linking for Keratoconus Patients

Efficacy Analysis of Corneal Crosslinking (CXL): Comparing Epi-on and Epi-off Procedures

Topography-guided Transepithelial Accelerated Corneal Collagen Cross-Linking for Low Refractive Error Correction in Keratoconus Treatment: a Pilot Study

Crosslinking with UV-A and riboflavin in progressive keratoconus: From laboratory to clinical practice - Developments over 25 years

Topography-guided Corneal Surface Laser Ablation Combined with Simultaneous Accelerated Corneal Collagen Cross-Linking for Treatment of Keratoconus

Corneal collagen cross-linking in patients with keratoconus from the Dresden protocol to customized solutions: theoretical basis

Conventional vs. pulsed-light accelerated corneal collagen cross-linking for the treatment of progressive keratoconus: 12-month results from a prospective study

[Comparative evaluation of different corneal cross-linking techniques with respect to biomechanical stability of the cornea]

Network meta-analysis comparing efficacy and safety of different protocols of corneal cross-linking for the treatment of progressive keratoconus