Abstract:BACKGROUND: The management of pain, agitation, and delirium (PAD) in Intensive Care Unit (ICU) is beneficial for patients and makes it widely applied in clinical practice. Previous studies showed that the clinical practice of PAD in ICU was improving; yet relatively little information is available in China. This study aimed to investigate the practice of PAD in ICUs in China.METHODS: A multicenter, nationwide survey was conducted using a clinician-directed questionnaire from September 19 to December 18, 2016. The questionnaire focused on the assessment and management of PAD by the clinicians in ICUs. The practice of PAD was compared among the four regions of China (North, Southeast, Northwest, and Southwest). The data were expressed as percentage and frequency. The Chi-square test, Fisher's exact test, and line-row Chi-square test were used.RESULTS: Of the 1011 valid questionnaire forms, the response rate was 80.37%. The clinicians came from 704 hospitals across 158 cities of China. The rate of PAD assessment was 75.77%, 90.21%, and 66.77%, respectively. The rates of PAD scores were 45.8%, 68.94%, and 34.03%, respectively. The visual analog scale, Richmond agitation-sedation scale, and confusion assessment method for the ICU were the first choices of scales for PAD assessment. Fentanyl, midazolam, and dexmedetomidine were the first choices of agents for analgesic, sedation, and delirium treatment. While choosing analgesics and sedatives, the clinicians put the pharmacological characteristics of drugs in the first place (66.07% and 76.36%). Daily interruption for sedation was carried out by 67.26% clinicians. Most of the clinicians (87.24%) used analgesics while using sedatives. Of the 738 (73%) clinicians titrating the sedatives on the basis of the proposed target sedation level, 268 (26.61%) clinicians just depended on their clinical experience. Totally, 519 (51.34%) clinicians never used other nondrug strategies for PAD. The working time of clinicians was an important factor in the management of analgesia and sedation rather than their titles and educational background. The ratios of pain score and sedation score in the Southwest China were the highest and the North China were the lowest. The ratios of delirium assessment and score were the same in the four regions of China. Moreover, the first choices of scales for PAD in the four regions were the same. However, the top three choices of agents in PAD treatment in the four regions were not the same.CONCLUSIONS: The practice of PAD in China follows the international guidelines; however, the pain assessment should be improved. The PAD practice is a little different across the four regions of China; however, the trend is consistent.TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study is registered at http://www.clinicaltrials.gov (No. ChiCTR-OOC-16009014, www.chictr. org.cn/index.aspx.).

Implementation of the “awakening and breathing trials, choice of drugs, delirium management, and early exercise/mobility” bundle in the pediatric intensive care unit of tertiary hospitals in southwestern China: a cross-sectional survey

ABCDEF Bundle Practices for Critically Ill Children: An International Survey of 161 PICUs in 18 Countries

The Design and Clinical Application of a Multidisciplinary Round Electronic Checklist in ICU

A Survey of Implementation of ABCDE Protocols

Implementation of the PADIS 2018 Guidelines: a National Multicenter Survey in the Adults Intensive Care Units in Mainland China

A National Multicenter Survey on Management of Pain, Agitation, and Delirium in Intensive Care Units in China

Implementation and Routinization of the ABCDE Bundle: A Mixed Methods Evaluation

Implementation of Pharmacists' Interventions and Assessment of Medication Errors in an Intensive Care Unit of A Chinese Tertiary Hospital

Survey of Attitudes and Behaviors of Healthcare Professionals on Delirium in ICU

Acute Care of At-Risk Newborns (acorn): Quantitative and Qualitative Educational Evaluation of the Program in a Region of China

Worldwide Survey of the "Assessing Pain, Both Spontaneous Awakening and Breathing Trials, Choice of Drugs, Delirium Monitoring/Management, Early Exercise/Mobility, and Family Empowerment" (ABCDEF) Bundle.

The ABCDE bundle implementation in an intensive care unit: Facilitators and barriers perceived by nurses and doctors

Modified ABCDEF-Bundles for Critically Ill Pediatric Patients - What Could They Look Like?

ABCDE and ABCDEF care bundles: A systematic review of the implementation process in intensive care units

Lessons Learned From a Systematic, Hospital-Wide Implementation of the ABCDEF Bundle: A Survey Evaluation

Attitudes, knowledge and practices concerning delirium among paediatric intensive care unit nurses: a multisite cross-sectional study in Sichuan, China

The impact of ABCDE bundle implementation on patient outcomes: A nationwide cohort study

Implementation of a Delirium Bundle for Pediatric Intensive Care Patients

Early Rehabilitation in Critically ill Children: A Two Center Implementation Study*

Caring for Critically Ill Patients with the ABCDEF Bundle: Results of the ICU Liberation Collaborative in Over 15,000 Adults

Multicentre implementation of a quality improvement initiative to reduce delirium in adult intensive care units: An interrupted time series analysis