A case–control study examining the association of smad7 and TLR single nucleotide polymorphisms on the risk of colorectal cancer in ulcerative colitis

Frank Reilly,John P. Burke,Grainne Lennon,Elaine W. Kay,Deborah A. McNamara,Garret Cullen,Glen A. Doherty,Hugh Mulcahy,Sean Martin,Desmond C. Winter,Kieran Sheahan,Patrick Ronan O’Connell
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/codi.15550
IF: 3.4
2021-02-24
Colorectal Disease
Abstract:AimUlcerative colitis (UC) is characterized by chronic mucosal inflammation, and an increased risk of colorectal cancer. Smad7, TLR2 and TLR4 modulate intestinal inflammation and their polymorphisms affect the risk of sporadic colorectal cancer development. The current study examines the association between single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in smad7, TLR2 and TLR4 and colorectal cancer development in patients with UC. METHODSDNA was extracted from formalin‐fixed, paraffin‐embedded tissue from 90 patients with UC who had undergone panproctocolectomy between 1985‐2013; 30 with UC associated colorectal cancer and 60 control UC patients. Control cases were matched 2:1 for age at diagnosis of colitis, duration of disease and gender. Genotyping was performed for the smad7 rs4464148, rs11874392, rs12953717, and rs4939827 SNPs, the TLR2 rs5743704 and rs5743708 SNPs and the TLR4 rs4986790 and rs4986791 SNPs. RESULTS63/90 (70%) of patients were male and the mean age at diagnosis of UC was 38.6±1.6 years. The mean time to the diagnosis of UC associated colorectal cancer was 13.5±1.9 years. The 5‐year recurrence free and cancer specific survival rates were 76% and 88% respectively. All 8 SNPs were in Hardy‐Weinberg equilibrium. None of the 8 SNPs assessed in smad7, TLR2 or TLR4 were associated with the development of UC associated colorectal cancer at an allelic or genotypic level. CONCLUSIONSThese data do not support an association between polymorphisms in smad7, TLR2 or TLR4 and the development of UC associated colorectal cancer.
gastroenterology & hepatology,surgery
What problem does this paper attempt to address?