Dependencies, semantic constraints and conceptual closeness in a dynamic frame theory

Ralf Naumann
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110720327-004
2021-12-31
Abstract:A neglected, if not almost ignored topic in formal semantic theories of natural language are semantic (or meaning) relations between lexical items. Results from psycholinguistics and neuroscience, in particular based on the N400, provide ample evidence that such relations play indeed an important and prominent role during the (semantic) processing of sentences in the brain. For example, although neither John squeezed an orange nor John squeezed an apple contain a semantic anomaly, they are processed differently in the brain, because orange is more expected as the direct object of squeeze than apple. Similarly, This melon sounds ripe is acceptable whereas This melon sounds oval is not, although in both cases an adjective is used that is semantically not directly related to the sound dimension of a melon. In this article we propose a dynamic and probabilistic extension of frame theory (Löbner 2014, Naumann 2013) in which data like the above can be analyzed. In order to capture both semantic relations and constraints (or expectancies), we use techniques from Dependence Logic (Väänänen 2007) and theories of belief revision and belief update (Spohn 1988, Goldszmidt & Pearl 1992, Boutilier 1998, Gärdenfors 1988). Using frames makes it possible to use a decompositional analysis: an object is related to a set of properties that can be changed by events. As a consequence, a lexical item like ‘orange’ can be taken as a table in a database or knowledge base consisting of attribute-value pairs. This way of interpreting lexical items makes it possible to apply the strategies from Dependence Logic and theories of belief revision and belief update mentioned above. In particular, it is possible (i) to define dependency relations between different properties of an object and (ii) to define quantitative plausiblity relations (κ-rankings) on a frame that determine how this frame is revised or updated with new information.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?