Abstract:Background: Personal information, including health-related data, may be used in ways we did not intend when it was originally shared. However, the organizations that collect these data do not always have the necessary social license to use and share it. Although some technology companies have published principles on the ethical use of artificial intelligence, the foundational issue of what is and is not acceptable to do with data, not just the analytical tools to manage it, has not been fully considered. Furthermore, it is unclear whether input from the public or patients has been included. In 2017, the leadership at a web-based patient research network began to envision a new kind of community compact that laid out what the company believed, how the company should behave, and what it promised both to the individuals who engaged with them and to the community at large. While having already earned a social license from patient members as a trusted data steward with strong privacy, transparency, and openness policies, the company sought to protect and strengthen that social license by creating a socially and ethically responsible data contract. Going beyond regulatory and legislative requirements, this contract considered the ethical use of multiomics and phenotypic data in addition to patient-reported and generated data. Objective: A multistakeholder working group sought to develop easy-to-understand commitments that established expectations for data stewardship, governance, and accountability from those who seek to collect, use, and share personal data. The working group cocreated a framework that was radically patient-first in its thinking and collaborative in the process of its codevelopment; it reflected the values, ideas, opinions, and perspectives of the cocreators, inclusive of patients and the public. Methods: Leveraging the conceptual frameworks of cocreation and participatory action research, a mixed methods approach was used that included a landscape analysis, listening sessions, and a 12-question survey. The methodological approaches used by the working group were guided by the combined principles of biomedical ethics and social license and shaped through a collaborative and reflective process with similarities to reflective equilibrium, a method well known in ethics. Results: Commitments for the Digital Age are the output of this work. The six commitments in order of priority are (1) continuous and shared learning; (2) respect and empower individual choice; (3) informed and understood consent; (4) people-first governance; (5) open communication and accountable conduct; and (6) inclusivity, diversity, and equity. Conclusions: These 6 commitments-and the development process itself-have broad applicability as models for (1) other organizations that rely on digitized data sources from individuals and (2) patients who seek to strengthen operational policies for the ethical and responsible collection, use, and reuse of that data.

Ethical Issues in Consent for the Reuse of Data in Health Data Platforms

Contextual Consent: Ethical Mining of Social Media for Health Research

Commitments for Ethically Responsible Sourcing, Use, and Reuse of Patient Data in the Digital Age: Cocreation Process

A Consent Model for Blockchain-based Distributed Data Sharing Platforms

The social licence for data-intensive health research: towards co-creation, public value and trust

What ethical approaches are used by scientists when sharing health data? An interview study

Transforming Scientific Inquiry: Tapping Into Digital Data by Building a Culture of Transparency and Consent

Recovering the History of Informed Consent for Data Science and Internet Industry Research Ethics

The practical ethics of repurposing health data: how to acknowledge invisible data work and the need for prioritization

Open Data governance at the Canadian Open Neuroscience Platform (CONP): From the Walled Garden to the Arboretum

Who owns (or controls) health data?

Enhancing the reuse of health data for research purposes: laws and regulations as pillars of trust

Automating Dynamic Consent Decisions for the Processing of Social Media Data in Health Research

Trust and Inclusion in Digital Health: The Need to Transform Consent

"Data is the new oil": citizen science and informed consent in an era of researchers handling of an economically valuable resource

"Data makes the story come to life:" understanding the ethical and legal implications of Big Data research involving ethnic minority healthcare workers in the United Kingdom-a qualitative study

Advancing a Consent-Forward Paradigm for Digital Mental Health Data

Data protection, information governance and the potential erosion of ethnographic methods in health care?

Patient and Public Willingness to Share Personal Health Data for Third-Party or Secondary Uses: Systematic Review

Ethical Issues in Social Science Research Employing Big Data

Data professionals' attitudes on data privacy, sharing, and consent in healthcare and research