Bench‐to‐bedside translation of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells using a multiscale systems pharmacokinetic‐pharmacodynamic model: A case study with anti‐BCMA CAR‐T

Aman P. Singh,Wenbo Chen,Xirong Zheng,Hardik Mody,Thomas J. Carpenter,Alice Zong,Donald L. Heald
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/psp4.12598
2021-03-24
CPT: Pharmacometrics and Systems Pharmacology
Abstract:<p>Despite tremendous success of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy in clinical oncology, the dose‐exposure‐response relationship of CAR‐T cells in patients is poorly understood. Moreover, the key drug‐ and system‐specific determinants leading to favourable clinical outcomes are also unknown. Here, we have developed a multiscale mechanistic PK‐PD model for anti‐BCMA (bb2121) CAR‐T cell therapy to characterize 1) <i>in vitro</i> target cell killing in multiple BCMA expressing tumor cell lines at varying E:T ratios, 2) preclinical <i>in vivo</i> tumor growth inhibition (TGI) and blood CAR‐T cell expansion in xenograft mice, and 3) clinical PK and PD biomarkers in multiple myeloma (MM) patients. Our translational PK‐PD relationship was able to effectively describe the commonly observed multiphasic CAR‐T cell PK profile in clinic, consisting of <i>rapid distribution</i>, <i>expansion</i>, <i>contraction</i> and <i>persistent</i> phases, as well as accounted for the categorical individual responses in multiple myeloma to effectively calculate progression‐free survival rates. Preclinical and clinical data analysis revealed comparable parameter estimates pertaining to CAR‐T cell functionality and suggested that patient baseline tumor burden could be more sensitive than dose levels towards overall extent of exposure (Cmax) after CAR‐T cell infusion. Virtual patient simulations also suggested a very steep dose‐exposure‐response relationship with CAR‐T cell therapy and indicated presence of a 'threshold' dose, beyond which a flat dose‐response curve could be observed. Our simulations were concordant with multiple clinical observations discussed within this paper. Moving forward, this framework could be leveraged <i>a priori</i>, to explore multiple infusions and support preclinical/clinical development of future CAR‐T cell therapies.</p>
What problem does this paper attempt to address?