Combined therapy of intensive statin plus intravenous rt-PA in acute ischemic stroke: the INSPIRE randomized clinical trial

Wan-Yong Yang,Yu-Feng Li,Zi-Ran Wang,Tian-Xia Yu,Dong-Juan Xu,Nan Yang,Xiao-Yuan Niu,Xue-Li Cai,Wen-Yan Zhuo,Xue-Mei Wu,Min Yan,Jun-Shan Zhou,Hao-Wen Zhang,Zhi-Gang Liang,Wen-Jun Wu,Jian-Hua Cheng,Li-An Huang,Yu-Sheng Zhang,Ying Guan,Ze-Feng Tan,Dan Lu,Niu He,Da-Wei Dong,Hui-Li Zhu,Bing Yang,Qing-Yu Shen,An-Ding Xu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-020-10388-3
2021-02-08
Journal of Neurology
Abstract:<span class="a-plus-plus abstract-section id-a-sec1"><h3 class="a-plus-plus">Objective</h3><p class="a-plus-plus">To investigate the safety and efficacy of intensive statin in the acute phase of ischemic stroke after intravenous thrombolysis therapy. </p></span><span class="a-plus-plus abstract-section id-a-sec2"><h3 class="a-plus-plus">Methods</h3><p class="a-plus-plus">A total of 310 stroke patients treated with rt-PA were randomly scheduled into the intensive statin group (rosuvastatin 20 mg daily × 14 days) and the control group (rosuvastatin 5 mg daily × 14 days). The primary clinical endpoint was excellent functional outcome (mRS ≤ 1) at 3 months, and the primary safety endpoint was symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) in 90 days.</p></span><span class="a-plus-plus abstract-section id-a-sec3"><h3 class="a-plus-plus">Results</h3><p class="a-plus-plus">The intensive statin users did not achieve a favorable outcome in excellent functional outcome (mRS ≤ 1) at 3 months compared with controls (70.3% vs. 66.5%, <em class="a-plus-plus">p</em> = 0.464). Intensive statin also not significantly improved the overall distribution of scores on the modified Rankin scale, as compared with controls (<em class="a-plus-plus">p</em> = 0.82 by the Cochran–Mantel–Haenszel test). The incidence of primary safety endpoint events (sICH) in 90 days did not significantly differ between the intensive statin group and control group (0.6% vs. 1.3%, <em class="a-plus-plus">p</em> &gt; 0.999).</p></span><span class="a-plus-plus abstract-section id-a-sec4"><h3 class="a-plus-plus">Conclusion</h3><p class="a-plus-plus">The INSPIRE study indicated that intensive statin therapy may not improve clinical outcomes compared with the low dose of statin therapy in AIS patients undergoing intravenous thrombolysis, and the two groups had similar safety profile.</p></span><span class="a-plus-plus abstract-section id-a-sec5"><h3 class="a-plus-plus">Clinical trial registration</h3><p class="a-plus-plus">URL: <a class="a-plus-plus" href="http://www.chictr.org">http://www.chictr.org</a>. Unique identifier: ChiCTR-IPR-16008642</p></span>
clinical neurology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?