Abstract:Recent analyses have demonstrated that COVID-19 patients are at higher risk of venous thromboembolic (VTE) events which increase the mortality risk and need of intensive care admission in the short-term period. In this regard, it has been suggested that prophylactic anticoagulation was associated with lower in-hospital mortality among SARS-CoV-2 patients, modifying the standard of care of these subjects [[1]Vaughn V.M. Yost M. Abshire C. Flanders S.A. Paje D. Grant P. Kaatz S. Kim T. Barnes G.D. Trends in venous thromboembolism anticoagulation in patients hospitalized with COVID-19.JAMA Netw. Open. 2021; 4e2111788https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.11788Crossref PubMed Scopus (39) Google Scholar]. Notably, IL-1 and 6, which constitute a relevant part of the cytokine storm triggered by the SARS-CoV-2 infection, promote thrombosis by activating platelets, endothelium, monocytes, and the tissue factor VIIa pathway; moreover, they inhibit fibrinolysis and natural anticoagulants, including protein C and S [2Thachil J. Tang N. Gando S. et al.ISTH interim guidance on recognition and management of coagulopathy in COVID-19.J. Thromb. Haemost. 2020; 18: 1023-1026https://doi.org/10.1111/jth.14810Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (1292) Google Scholar, 3Eljilany I. Elzouki A.N. D-dimer, fibrinogen, and IL-6 in COVID-19 patients with suspected venous thromboembolism: a narrative review.Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2020 Nov 13; 16: 455-462https://doi.org/10.2147/VHRM.S280962Crossref PubMed Scopus (67) Google Scholar, 4Giannakodimos I. Gkountana G.V. Lykouras D. Karkoulias K. Tsakas S. The role of Interleukin-6 in the pathogenesis, prognosis and treatment of severe COVID-19.Curr Med Chem. 2020; (Epub ahead of print)https://doi.org/10.2174/0929867328666201209100259Crossref Scopus (13) Google Scholar]. However, the potential "protective" effect of IL-6 antagonists towards the onset of VTE has not yet been adequately investigated. To elucidate this aspect we performed, accordingly to the PRISMA guidelines (Supplementary file 1), a review of the literature searching for published randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the administration of IL-6 antagonists with usual care or placebo. For this purpose, RCTs were identified through systematic searches of ClinicalTrials.gov, the EU Clinical Trials Register, and the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform from October 2020 to June 2021. The selection of studies to be included in our analysis was independently conducted by 2 authors (MZ, GZ) in a blinded fashion. Any discrepancies in study selection were resolved consulting a third author (LR). The search terms used were random* AND COVID in the title or abstract, along with terms for common IL-6 antagonists and interleukin 6. Moreover, we separately search also the available IL-6 antagonists using the term tocizilumab and sarilumab, respectively. Searches were restricted to completed and published trial status in English language. RCTs were included if: they present data on the use of IL-6 antagonists in patients with confirmed diagnosis of COVID-19 infection, were in English language and compare the use of Tocilizumab against the standard of care. RCTs comparing the use of IL-6 against steroids or antiviral drugs were excluded. References from the included studies were screened to potentially identify other investigations meeting the inclusion criteria. For each trial, the risk of bias (low risk, some concerns, or high risk) was assessed using version 2 of the Cochrane Risk of Bias Assessment Tool [[5]Page M. JAC Sterne Savović J. RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials.BMJ. 2019; 366: l4898https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.l4898Crossref PubMed Scopus (10689) Google Scholar]. Risk of bias assessments was done independently by 3 of the investigators (M.Z., L.R., G.R.) (Supplementary file 2) with disagreements resolved through discussion. Ethical approval and informed consent were not required as the study did not directly enroll human subjects. The primary outcome of the study was to compare the VTE risk, in terms of odd ratio (OR), between COVID-19 patients treated with IL-6 antagonist and those treated with standard care. VTE events risk data were pooled using the Mantel–Haenszel random effects models with OR as the effect measure with 95% CI. Heterogeneity among studies was assessed using Higgins and Thomson I2. The presence of potential publication bias was verified by visual inspection of the funnel plot. Due to the low number of the included studies (<10), small-study bias was not examined as our analysis was underpowered to detect such bias. The meta-analysis was conducted using Comprehensive Meta-Analysis software, version 3 (Biostat, USA). A total of 76 potentially eligible trials were identified. After screening these investigations, 47 were excluded due to the absence of inclusion criteria and two studies since they compared the use of IL-6 antagonists with corticosteroids (n = 2). Among the remaining 29 eligible trials, only 9 were published (enrolling 6.893 COVID-19 patients, mean age 59.6 years, 4.462 males) and among these 4 reported data on the occurrence of VTE events [6Hermine O. Mariette X. Tharaux P.L. Resche-Rigon M. Porcher R. Ravaud P. CORIMUNO-19 Collaborative GroupEffect of tocilizumab vs usual care in adults hospitalized with COVID-19 and moderate or severe pneumonia: a randomized clinical trial.JAMA Intern Med. 2021; 181: 32-40https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.6820Crossref PubMed Scopus (583) Google Scholar, 7Stone J.H. Frigault M.J. Serling-Boyd N.J. Investigators B.A.C.C.Bay Tocilizumab Trial Efficacy of tocilizumab in patients hospitalized with Covid-19.N Engl J Med. 2020; 383: 2333-2344https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2028836Crossref PubMed Scopus (993) Google Scholar, 8DLC Farias Veiga V.C. JAGG Prats Coalition COVID-19 Brazil VI InvestigatorsEffect of tocilizumab on clinical outcomes at 15 days in patients with severe or critical coronavirus disease 2019: randomised controlled trial.BMJ. 2021; 372: n84https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n84Crossref PubMed Scopus (282) Google Scholar, 9Soin A.S. Kumar K. Choudhary N.S. Tocilizumab plus standard care versus standard care in patients in India with moderate to severe COVID-19-associated cytokine release syndrome (COVINTOC): an open-label, multicentre, randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial.Lancet Respir Med. 2021; 9: 511-521https://doi.org/10.1016/S2213-2600(21)00081-3Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (156) Google Scholar]. Overall, 681 patients (mean age 58.8 years, 469 males) with SARS-CoV-2 infection were included into the analysis (Table 1) [6Hermine O. Mariette X. Tharaux P.L. Resche-Rigon M. Porcher R. Ravaud P. CORIMUNO-19 Collaborative GroupEffect of tocilizumab vs usual care in adults hospitalized with COVID-19 and moderate or severe pneumonia: a randomized clinical trial.JAMA Intern Med. 2021; 181: 32-40https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.6820Crossref PubMed Scopus (583) Google Scholar, 7Stone J.H. Frigault M.J. Serling-Boyd N.J. Investigators B.A.C.C.Bay Tocilizumab Trial Efficacy of tocilizumab in patients hospitalized with Covid-19.N Engl J Med. 2020; 383: 2333-2344https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2028836Crossref PubMed Scopus (993) Google Scholar, 8DLC Farias Veiga V.C. JAGG Prats Coalition COVID-19 Brazil VI InvestigatorsEffect of tocilizumab on clinical outcomes at 15 days in patients with severe or critical coronavirus disease 2019: randomised controlled trial.BMJ. 2021; 372: n84https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n84Crossref PubMed Scopus (282) Google Scholar, 9Soin A.S. Kumar K. Choudhary N.S. Tocilizumab plus standard care versus standard care in patients in India with moderate to severe COVID-19-associated cytokine release syndrome (COVINTOC): an open-label, multicentre, randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial.Lancet Respir Med. 2021; 9: 511-521https://doi.org/10.1016/S2213-2600(21)00081-3Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (156) Google Scholar]. VTE events were reported as a complication of the treatment or potential adverse effect in 2.3% of cases (n = 16/681). More precisely, the incidence of thromboembolic events in patients treated with tocilizumab or sarilumab and controls were 1.5% (n = 6/380) [6Hermine O. Mariette X. Tharaux P.L. Resche-Rigon M. Porcher R. Ravaud P. CORIMUNO-19 Collaborative GroupEffect of tocilizumab vs usual care in adults hospitalized with COVID-19 and moderate or severe pneumonia: a randomized clinical trial.JAMA Intern Med. 2021; 181: 32-40https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.6820Crossref PubMed Scopus (583) Google Scholar, 7Stone J.H. Frigault M.J. Serling-Boyd N.J. Investigators B.A.C.C.Bay Tocilizumab Trial Efficacy of tocilizumab in patients hospitalized with Covid-19.N Engl J Med. 2020; 383: 2333-2344https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2028836Crossref PubMed Scopus (993) Google Scholar, 8DLC Farias Veiga V.C. JAGG Prats Coalition COVID-19 Brazil VI InvestigatorsEffect of tocilizumab on clinical outcomes at 15 days in patients with severe or critical coronavirus disease 2019: randomised controlled trial.BMJ. 2021; 372: n84https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n84Crossref PubMed Scopus (282) Google Scholar] and 3.3% (n = 10/301) [[9]Soin A.S. Kumar K. Choudhary N.S. Tocilizumab plus standard care versus standard care in patients in India with moderate to severe COVID-19-associated cytokine release syndrome (COVINTOC): an open-label, multicentre, randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial.Lancet Respir Med. 2021; 9: 511-521https://doi.org/10.1016/S2213-2600(21)00081-3Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (156) Google Scholar], respectively.Table 1General characteristics of the published trials comparing anti IL-6 drugs versus standard care (control) in the treatment of COVID-19 patients. T: Treatment group; C: Control group: CS: Corticosteroids; NR: Not reported.AuthorTrial NaAlso cause of death.NaAlso cause of death. of ptsTocilizumabNSarilumabNControlNMean age (years)MalesN, (%)VTE eventsAnticoagulationCSN (%)Hermine et al. [6]Hermine O. Mariette X. Tharaux P.L. Resche-Rigon M. Porcher R. Ravaud P. CORIMUNO-19 Collaborative GroupEffect of tocilizumab vs usual care in adults hospitalized with COVID-19 and moderate or severe pneumonia: a randomized clinical trial.JAMA Intern Med. 2021; 181: 32-40https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.6820Crossref PubMed Scopus (583) Google ScholarNCT0433180813063–6764.0 [57.1–74.3]bReferred to Tocilizumab group.63.3 [57.1–72.3]dReferred to control group.88 (67.6)T: 0/63C:3/67NRT: 18 (11.0)C:5(6.0)Stone et al. [7]Stone J.H. Frigault M.J. Serling-Boyd N.J. Investigators B.A.C.C.Bay Tocilizumab Trial Efficacy of tocilizumab in patients hospitalized with Covid-19.N Engl J Med. 2020; 383: 2333-2344https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2028836Crossref PubMed Scopus (993) Google ScholarNCT04356937243161–8259.8 [45.3–69.4]141(58)T: 2/161 DVT; 1/161 PEC: 2/82 DVT: 2/82 PENRT: 23 (11.0)C: 5 (6%)Veiga et al. [8]DLC Farias Veiga V.C. JAGG Prats Coalition COVID-19 Brazil VI InvestigatorsEffect of tocilizumab on clinical outcomes at 15 days in patients with severe or critical coronavirus disease 2019: randomised controlled trial.BMJ. 2021; 372: n84https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n84Crossref PubMed Scopus (282) Google ScholarNCT0440368512965–6457.4 (15.7)bReferred to Tocilizumab group.57.5 (13.5)dReferred to control group.88 (68.2)T: 2/65 DVTC: 3/64 PEHeparin (Prophylactic)T: 50 (94.0)C: 3 (6.0)Heparin(Therapeutic)T: 48 (89.0)C: 6 (11.0)T: 45 (69.2)C: 47 (73.4)Soin et al. [9]Soin A.S. Kumar K. Choudhary N.S. Tocilizumab plus standard care versus standard care in patients in India with moderate to severe COVID-19-associated cytokine release syndrome (COVINTOC): an open-label, multicentre, randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial.Lancet Respir Med. 2021; 9: 511-521https://doi.org/10.1016/S2213-2600(21)00081-3Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (156) Google ScholarCTRI/2020/05/025369179918856 [47–63]cReferred to Sarilumab group.54 [43–63]dReferred to control group.152 (84.9)S:1/91 PEC:0/88 PENRT: 83 (91.0)C:80 (91.0)a Also cause of death.b Referred to Tocilizumab group.c Referred to Sarilumab group.d Referred to control group. Open table in a new tab On pooled analysis, the potential protective effect against of IL-6 antagonists towards VTE events did not reach the statistical significance (OR: 0.48, 95% CI: 0.17–1.37, p = 0,17 I2 = 0%) (Fig. 1). The relative forest plot is presented in Supplementary file 3. Despite the potential pathophysiological link between IL-6 and VTE events, our brief analysis failed in demonstrating a lower risk of VTE events in COVID-19 patients treated with IL-6 antagonists. However, our results must be considered cautiously and as preliminary. Indeed, among the RCTs revised, none of the investigations reviewed assessed the risk of VTE events as an outcome of the study. Moreover, the sample analysed was very small and the potential pre-existing risk factors for thromboembolic events cannot be considered as confounding factors, potential distorting our results. Similarly, due to the scant data regarding the administration of anticoagulant treatments we cannot performed a meta-regression considering the use of these drugs as moderators; indeed, different anticoagulant regimens might have influenced the distribution of VTE events. However, the heterogeneity observed was low, providing relative robust statistical evidence of our findings. Notably, IL-6 antagonists have been frequently co-administered with glucocorticoids in the effort to obtain a synergistic effect as for example also in the REMAP- trial [[10]Al-Beidh F. Gordon A.C. Mouncey P.R. Investigators R.E.M.A.P.-C.A.P. Interleukin-6 receptor antagonists in critically ill patients with Covid-19.N Engl J Med. 2021; 384: 1491-1502https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2100433Crossref PubMed Scopus (1175) Google Scholar]; this aspect may represent another potential confounding factor that must be adequately considered in our analysis and adequately evaluated in future RCTs. In the near future, some important results will emerge from ongoing trials such as the HEPMAB (N° Trial NCT04600141) but in the meantime, whether IL-6 antagonists may reduce the risk of VTE events in COVID-19 patients when administered simultaneously with standard prophylactic anticoagulation urgently require larger and dedicated studies, also to identify potential adverse events related to the use of such cytokine inhibitor. The following are the supplementary data related to this article.Supplementary file 3Funnel plot for the risk of venous thromboembolic events in COVID-19 patients treated with IL-6 antagonists or standard of care.View Large Image Figure ViewerDownload Hi-res image Download (PPT) The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Efficacy of early anti-inflammatory treatment with high doses of intravenous anakinra with or without glucocorticoids in patients with severe COVID-19 pneumonia

Evaluation of the effects of anakinra treatment on clinic and laboratory results in patients with COVID-19

Efficacy and Safety of Glucocorticoids in Treatment of COVID-19: a Retrospective Study.

Effect of anakinra on mortality in patients with COVID-19: a systematic review and patient-level meta-analysis

Evaluating the Efficacy and Side Effects of Corticosteroid Therapy in Severely ill COVID-19 Patients

Real-life use of high-dose anakinra in patients with COVID-19 treated with remdesivir

Tocilizumab and steroid treatment in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia

Effect of anakinra versus usual care in adults in hospital with COVID-19 and mild-to-moderate pneumonia (CORIMUNO-ANA-1): a randomised controlled trial

Early treatment of COVID-19 with anakinra guided by soluble urokinase plasminogen receptor plasma levels: a double-blind, randomized controlled phase 3 trial

Respiratory Impairment Predicts Response to IL-1 and IL-6 Blockade in COVID-19 Patients With Severe Pneumonia and Hyper-Inflammation

Prediction of Survival by IL-6 in a Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trial of Anakinra in COVID-19 Cytokine Storm

Anakinra after treatment with corticosteroids alone or with tocilizumab in patients with severe COVID-19 pneumonia and moderate hyperinflammation. A retrospective cohort study

Use of high-dose steroid therapy: addition of anakinra in the treatment of severe COVID-19

Intravenous high-dose anakinra drops venous thrombosis and acute coronary syndrome in severe and critical COVID-19 patients: a propensity score matched study

Tocilizumab for the treatment of severe COVID-19 pneumonia with hyperinflammatory syndrome and acute respiratory failure: A single center study of 100 patients in Brescia, Italy

Continuous Intravenous Anakinra Infusion to Calm the Cytokine Storm in Macrophage Activation Syndrome

Reduction of Venous Thromboembolic Events in COVID-19 Patients: Which Role for IL-6 Antagonists?

Intravenous immunoglobulins in patients with COVID-19-associated moderate-to-severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ICAR): multicentre, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial

Successful treatment of severe COVID-19 pneumonia, a case series with simultaneous interleukin-1 and interleukin-6 blockade with 1-month follow-up

Specific Interleukin-1 Inhibitors, Specific Interleukin-6 Inhibitors, and GM-CSF Blockades for COVID-19 (at the Edge of Sepsis): A Systematic Review

Effect of anti-interleukin drugs in patients with COVID-19 and signs of cytokine release syndrome (COV-AID): a factorial, randomised, controlled trial