Abstract:In the context of global change drivers, specifically eutrophication and exotic species invasion, we seek to answer if plasticity in plant traits is adaptive or maladaptive for fitness in endangered, non‐endangered and invasive congeneric plant species in response to variation of nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) availability. Our results indicate that although some plant traits responded plastically to nutrient availability, they did not contribute to plant fitness. We further show differences in trait plasticity and their effects on fitness between the type of nutrient that was varied (N and P), but they were similar between endangered, non‐endangered and invasive plant species. Global change drivers such as eutrophication and plant invasions will create novel environments for many plant species. Through adaptive trait plasticity plants may maintain their performance under these novel conditions and may outcompete those showing low‐adaptive trait plasticity. In a greenhouse study, we determined if plasticity in traits is adaptive or maladaptive in endangered, nonendangered, and invasive plant species in response to variation of nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) availability (N:P ratios 1.7, 15, and 135) and whether plastic trait responses are adaptive and/or costly for fitness (i.e., biomass). Species choice comprised 17 species from three functional groups (legumes, nonlegume forbs, and grasses), either classified as endangered, nonendangered, or invasive. After 2 months, plants were harvested and nine traits related to carbon assimilation and nutrient uptake were measured (leaf area, SLA, LDMC, SPAD, RMR, root length, SRL, root surface area, and PME activity). We found more traits responding plastically to variation in P than in N. Plasticity only created costs when P was varied. Plasticity in traits was mostly adaptively neutral toward fitness, with plasticity in three traits being similarly adaptive across all species groups: SPAD (as a measure of chlorophyll content, adaptive to N and P limitation), leaf area, and root surface area (adaptive to P limitation). We found little differences in trait plasticity between endangered, nonendangered, and invasive species. Synthesis. Along a gradient from N limitation, balanced N:P supply, and P limitation, we found that the type of fluctuating nutrient (i.e., if N or P is varied) is decisive for the adaptive value of a trait. Variation in P availability (from balanced supply to P limitation) created both a stronger reduction in fitness as well as created plasticity costs in more traits than variation in N availability (from balanced supply to N limitation). However, the patterns observed in our study may change if nutrient availability is altered, either by nutrient inputs or by a shift in nutrient availabilities, for example, by decreasing N input as foreseen by European Legislation, but without simultaneously decreasing P input.

Fast invasives fastly become faster: Invasive plants align largely with the fast side of the plant economics spectrum

Differences in growth-economics of fast vs. slow growing grass species in response to temperature and nitrogen limitation individually, and in combination

Fast-growing and poorly shade-tolerant invasive species may exhibit higher physiological but not morphological plasticity compared with non-invasive species

Plant functional traits reflect different dimensions of species invasiveness.

Fast seedling root growth leads to competitive superiority of invasive plants

Why Are Invasive Plants Successful?

Rapid phenotypic differentiation in the iconic Japanese knotweed s.l. invading novel habitats

Root plasticity benefits a global invasive species in eutrophic coastal wetlands

Phenotypic plasticity of light use favors a plant invader in nitrogen‐enriched ecosystems

Altered trait covariances between invasive and native ranges of a global plant invader

Invasive plant species support each other's growth in low‐nutrient conditions but compete when nutrients are abundant

Increasing and fluctuating resource availability enhances invasional meltdown

Fast and Furious: Early Differences in Growth Rate Drive Short‐term Plant Dominance and Exclusion under Eutrophication

Invasive Plant Species Demonstrate Enhanced Resource Acquisition Traits Relative to Native Non-Dominant Species but Not the Case Compared with Native Dominant Species

Nitrogen acquisition strategy and its effects on invasiveness of a subtropical invasive plant

Epigenetics and the success of invasive plants

Naturalization and invasion of alien plants: concepts and definitions

Contrasting Plant Adaptation Strategies to Latitude in the Native and Invasive Range of Spartina Alterniflora.

Adaptive plasticity and fitness costs of endangered, nonendangered, and invasive plants in response to variation in nitrogen and phosphorus availabilities

How much do phenotypic plasticity and local genetic variation contribute to phenotypic divergences along environmental gradients in widespread invasive plants? A meta‐analysis

Invasive‐plant traits, native‐plant traits, and their divergences as invasion factors