Abstract:Research summary: Drawing on the “varieties of capitalism” literature, we develop an actor-centered framework that explains firm-level corporate social performance (CSP) by emphasizing the importance of considering owners’ and other stakeholders’ motives towards CSP — which can be instrumental, relational or moral — and their salience in the national institutional setting. Results from an international panel show that investment company (government) ownership has a stronger negative (positive) relationship with CSP in liberal markets, in which owners are the key stakeholder, as compared to coordinated markets, which counterbalance the interests of multiple stakeholders. Family and company ownership have weaker links to CSP across institutional settings. We discuss implications for research and practice and argue that CSP policies may hold more relevance in liberal rather than coordinated market economies.Managerial summary: Existing debates focus on the impact of corporate social performance (CSP) on firm outcomes. Less is known about the motives and pressures behind CSP, which may explain its variability across firms and institutional settings. We argue that powerful owners’ motives are important for explaining CSP in liberal markets, where shareholders are the most important stakeholder, as compared to coordinated markets, which confer prominence to multiple stakeholders. Owners’ motives are not homogeneous and depending on the type of owners the link between ownership concentration and CSP can be negative (for investment companies) or positive (for governments). In coordinated markets, owners have a weaker impact on CSP, which is mostly attributable to their lower salience relative to stakeholders, rather than to a change in their motives.

Examining the impact of control and ownership on social enterprises’ public value creation using integrative publicness theory

Contract Governance and Value Co-Creation in Virtual Community: the Moderating Effect of Psychological Ownership

Corporate Social Responsibility, Ownership Structure, and Firm Value: Evidence from Korea

Evaluation and Modeling of Internal Control Performance In State-owned Cultural Enterprises Under the Context of Digital Management

Sustainability of Entrepreneurship: An Empirical Study on the Impact Path of Corporate Social Responsibility Based on Internal Control

Research on the Influence of Network Position on Corporate Social Responsibility: Moderating Effect Based on Ownership Concentration

Effects of the Entrepreneurial Strategic Orientation of Social Enterprises on Organizational Effectiveness: Case of South Korea

The Effectiveness of Internal Control and Corporate Social Responsibility: Evidence from Chinese Capital Market

Understanding social impact assessment through public value theory

Psychological Ownership: How Having Control Matters

The co-creation of social value: what matters for public participation in corporate social responsibility campaigns

Divergent Interests between Central and Local Governments: Testing Theories of Public Ownership

Going Public and Innovation Strategy: the Role of Ownership Structure

Does Ownership Affect Corporate Social Responsibility? Evidence from Chinese Companies' Response to Targeted Poverty Alleviation

The Pressure Behind Corporate Social Performance: Ownership and Institutional Configurations

The effectiveness of internal control and innovation performance: An intermediary effect based on corporate social responsibility

Partial Ownership for a Public Firm and Corporate Social Responsibility

How Do Various Forms of Ownership Impact Firm Performance?

"Ownership Transition, Managerial Short-Termism, and Exploratory Vs Exploitative Innovation Strategy"

Social Value as a Mechanism for Linking Public Administrators with Society: Identifying the Meaning, Forms and Process of Social Value Creation

Business Owners’ Achieved Social Status and Corporate Philanthropy: Evidence from Chinese Private Small- and Medium-Sized Enterprises