Mixed effects models but not t-tests or linear regression detect progression of apathy in Parkinson's disease over seven years in a cohort: a comparative analysis
Anne-Marie Hanff,Rejko Krüger,Christopher McCrum,Christophe Ley,NCER-PD,Geeta Acharya,Gloria Aguayo,Myriam Alexandre,Muhammad Ali,Wim Ammerlann,Giuseppe Arena,Michele Bassis,Roxane Batutu,Katy Beaumont,Sibylle Béchet,Guy Berchem,Alexandre Bisdorff,Ibrahim Boussaad,David Bouvier,Lorieza Castillo,Gessica Contesotto,Nancy de Bremaeker,Brian Dewitt,Nico Diederich,Rene Dondelinger,Nancy E Ramia,Angelo Ferrari,Katrin Frauenknecht,Joëlle Fritz,Carlos Gamio,Manon Gantenbein,Piotr Gawron,Laura Georges,Soumyabrata Ghosh,Marijus Giraitis,Enrico Glaab,Martine Goergen,Elisa Gómez de Lope,Jérôme Graas,Mariella Graziano,Valentin Groues,Anne Grünewald,Gaël Hammot,Linda Hansen,Michael Heneka,Estelle Henry,Margaux Henry,Sylvia Herbrink,Sascha Herzinger,Alexander Hundt,Nadine Jacoby,Sonja Jónsdóttir,Jochen Klucken,Olga Kofanova,Pauline Lambert,Zied Landoulsi,Roseline Lentz,Laura Longhino,Ana Festas Lopes,Victoria Lorentz,Tainá M Marques,Guilherme Marques,Patricia Martins Conde,Patrick May,Deborah Mcintyre,Chouaib Mediouni,Francoise Meisch,Alexia Mendibide,Myriam Menster,Maura Minelli,Michel Mittelbronn,Saïda Mtimet,Maeva Munsch,Romain Nati,Ulf Nehrbass,Sarah Nickels,Beatrice Nicolai,Jean-Paul Nicolay,Fozia Noor,Clarissa P C Gomes,Sinthuja Pachchek,Claire Pauly,Laure Pauly,Lukas Pavelka,Magali Perquin,Achilleas Pexaras,Armin Rauschenberger,Rajesh Rawal,Dheeraj Reddy Bobbili,Lucie Remark,Ilsé Richard,Olivia Roland,Kirsten Roomp,Eduardo Rosales,Stefano Sapienza,Venkata Satagopam,Sabine Schmitz,Reinhard Schneider,Jens Schwamborn,Raquel Severino,Amir Sharify,Ruxandra Soare,Ekaterina Soboleva,Kate Sokolowska,Maud Theresine,Hermann Thien,Elodie Thiry,Rebecca Ting Jiin Loo,Johanna Trouet,Olena Tsurkalenko,Michel Vaillant,Carlos Vega,Liliana Vilas Boas,Paul Wilmes,Evi Wollscheid-Lengeling,Gelani Zelimkhanov
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-024-02301-7
2024-08-24
Abstract:Introduction: While there is an interest in defining longitudinal change in people with chronic illness like Parkinson's disease (PD), statistical analysis of longitudinal data is not straightforward for clinical researchers. Here, we aim to demonstrate how the choice of statistical method may influence research outcomes, (e.g., progression in apathy), specifically the size of longitudinal effect estimates, in a cohort. Methods: In this retrospective longitudinal analysis of 802 people with typical Parkinson's disease in the Luxembourg Parkinson's study, we compared the mean apathy scores at visit 1 and visit 8 by means of the paired two-sided t-test. Additionally, we analysed the relationship between the visit numbers and the apathy score using linear regression and longitudinal two-level mixed effects models. Results: Mixed effects models were the only method able to detect progression of apathy over time. While the effects estimated for the group comparison and the linear regression were smaller with high p-values (+ 1.016/ 7 years, p = 0.107, -0.056/ 7 years, p = 0.897, respectively), effect estimates for the mixed effects models were positive with a very small p-value, indicating a significant increase in apathy symptoms by + 2.345/ 7 years (p < 0.001). Conclusion: The inappropriate use of paired t-tests and linear regression to analyse longitudinal data can lead to underpowered analyses and an underestimation of longitudinal change. While mixed effects models are not without limitations and need to be altered to model the time sequence between the exposure and the outcome, they are worth considering for longitudinal data analyses. In case this is not possible, limitations of the analytical approach need to be discussed and taken into account in the interpretation.