Abstract:The role of money in the design and conduct of monetary policy has reemerged as an important issue in both advanced and developing economies, especially since the 2007 global financial crisis. A growing body of recent literature suggests that the <i>causal</i> relationship between money supply growth and inflation remains intact across countries and over time and that this relation is not conditional on the stability of the money‐demand function or whether money is endogenous or exogenous. Moreover, critical for a rule‐based monetary policy is the presence of a long‐run stable money‐demand function, rather than a short‐run money‐demand model that may exhibit instability for many reasons, including problems with estimating a money‐demand model with high‐frequency data. Provided that a stable money‐demand function exists, it could be useful to establish long‐run equilibrium relations among money, output, prices, and exchange rates, as the classical monetary theory suggests. Within this analytical framework, this paper addresses the question of whether money has any role in the conduct of monetary policy in Australia. The conventional wisdom is that the money‐demand function in Australia has been unstable since the mid‐1980s due to financial deregulation and reforms; this led to a change in the strategy of monetary policy for price stability in the form of inflation targeting that ignores money insofar as inflation and its control are concerned. This paper reports empirical findings for Australia, obtained from a longer quarterly data series over the period 1960Q1–2015Q1, which suggest that instability in the narrow‐money‐demand function in Australia was primarily due to the exclusion of variables which have become important in the deregulated environment since the 1980s. These findings are confirmed by an expanded form of the narrow‐money‐demand function that was found stable over the past two decades, although it experienced multiple structural breaks over the study period. The paper draws the conclusion that abandoning the monetary aggregate as an instrument of monetary policy in Australia, under a rule‐based monetary policy such as inflation targeting, cannot be justified by instability in the money‐demand function or even by lack of a <i>causal</i> link between money supply growth and inflation.

Reforming Australian Monetary Policy: How Nominal Income Targeting Can Help Get the Reserve Bank Back on Track

Monetary Policy Mistakes and Remedies: An Assessment Following the RBA Review

The case for nominal GDP level targeting

Asymmetric monetary policy rules in Australia

The RBA (Reserve Bank of Australia) Review 2023: A missed opportunity

The Case for Reform of the Reserve Bank of Australia Policy and Communication Strategy

How justified is abandoning money in the conduct of monetary policy in Australia on the grounds of instability in the money‐demand function?

Milton Friedman and nominal income targeting

Inflation-Plus Targeting at the Reserve Bank of Australia

Modelling the Reserve Bank of Australia's Policy Decisions and the Case for a Negative Cash Rate

Does the Reserve Bank of Australia follow a forward-looking nonlinear monetary policy rule?

Monetary policy and interest rates under inflation targeting in Australia and New Zealand

Monetary-fiscal interactions under price level targeting

Can we Use High‐Frequency Data to Better Understand the Effects of Monetary Policy and its Communication? Yes and No!

A reconsideration of money growth rules

Considerations on inflation, economic growth, and the 2 per cent inflation target

In Search of Targeting Rules for Monetary and Macroprudential Policy

The Role of Housing Costs in Central Banks’ Inflation Targeting Regimes: The Cases of the Reserve Bank of Australia and the Bank of England

Does Institutional Change Really Matter? Inflation Targets, Central Bank Reform and Interest Rate Policy in the OECD Countries

The FED’s Strategy on a Targets-based Monetary Policy Framework

The devolution of federal reserve monetary policy strategy, 2012–24