Abstract:figure legend This study evaluates the functional and molecular consequences of modulating different regulatory loops of the muscle‐intrinsic clock, through extensive phenotypic, transcriptomic, proteomic and metabolomic profiling of the muscle around the clock. Overall, deletion of PER2 and RORα and, as a proxy, modulation of the primary or secondary feedback arms, leads to shared but distinct outcomes in terms of the transcriptome, proteome and phenotype. Perturbations of both the primary (PER2 MKO) and secondary arms (RORα MKO) of the core clock dampen the amplitude of expression of many clock and clock‐associated genes but do not affect their phase, thereby maintaining basic circadian oscillation in the muscle. The deletion of PER2 and RORα affects muscle metabolism and homeostasis in a circadian manner, through modulation of metabolic and mitochondrial genes, which encode proteins involved in amino acid metabolism, the tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle and mitochondrial biogenesis, thereby affecting amino acid and ion homeostasis. As a result, glucose and lipid metabolism, in addition to amino acid metabolism, are impacted in these knockouts, highlighting the central role of the molecular clock in modulating muscle plasticity. ATP: adenosine triphosphate, ETC: electron transport chain. Circadian rhythms, governed by the dominant central clock, in addition to various peripheral clocks, regulate almost all biological processes, including sleep–wake cycles, hormone secretion and metabolism. In certain contexts, the regulation and function of the peripheral oscillations can be decoupled from the central clock. However, the specific mechanisms underlying muscle‐intrinsic clock‐dependent modulation of muscle function and metabolism remain unclear. We investigated the outcome of perturbations of the primary and secondary feedback loops of the molecular clock in skeletal muscle by specific gene ablation of Period circadian regulator 2 (Per2) and RAR‐related orphan receptor alpha (Rorα), respectively. In both models, a dampening of core clock gene oscillation was observed, while the phase was preserved. Moreover, both loops seem to be involved in the homeostasis of amine groups. Highly divergent outcomes were seen for overall muscle gene expression, primarily affecting circadian rhythmicity in the PER2 knockouts and non‐oscillating genes in the RORα knockouts, leading to distinct outcomes in terms of metabolome and phenotype. These results highlight the entanglement of the molecular clock and muscle plasticity and allude to specific functions of different clock components, i.e. the primary and secondary feedback loops, in this context. The reciprocal interaction between muscle contractility and circadian clocks might therefore be instrumental to determining a finely tuned adaptation of muscle tissue to perturbations in health and disease. Key points Specific perturbations of the primary and secondary feedback loop of the molecular clock result in specific outcomes on muscle metabolism and function. Ablation of Per2 (primary loop) or Rorα (secondary loop) blunts the amplitude of core clock genes, in absence of a shift in phase. Perturbation of the primary feedback loop by deletion of PER2 primarily affects muscle gene oscillation. Knockout of RORα and the ensuing modulation of the secondary loop results in the aberrant expression of a large number of non‐clock genes and proteins. The deletion of PER2 and RORα affects muscle metabolism and contractile function in a circadian manner, highlighting the central role of the molecular clock in modulating muscle plasticity.

Diurnal variations in the expression of core-clock genes correlate with resting muscle properties and predict fluctuations in exercise performance across the day

Daily running enhances molecular and physiological circadian rhythms in skeletal muscle

Circadian modulation of the cardiac proteome underpins differential adaptation to morning and evening exercise training: an LC-MS/MS analysis

Intrinsic skeletal muscle function and contraction-stimulated glucose uptake do not vary by time-of-day in mice

Time to Train: The Involvement of the Molecular Clock in Exercise Adaptation of Skeletal Muscle

BMAL1/PGC1α4-FNDC5/irisin axis impacts distinct outcomes of time-of-day resistance exercise

The Clockwork of Champions: Influence of Circadian Biology on Exercise Performance

Diurnal variation in skeletal muscle mitochondrial function dictates time of day-dependent differences in exercise capacity

Circadian Rhythms, the Molecular Clock, and Skeletal Muscle

Morphological, molecular and hormonal adaptations to early morning versus afternoon resistance training

Circadian variation in muscle force output in males using isokinetic, isometric dynamometry: can we observe this in multi-joint movements using the muscleLab force-velocity encoder and are they similar in peak and magnitude?

Mechanical Stress Affects Circadian Rhythm In Skeletal Muscle (C2c12 Myoblasts) By Reducing Per/Cry Gene Expression And Increasing Bmal1 Gene Expression

Interactions of cortisol, testosterone, and resistance training: influence of circadian rhythms

Mood Status Response to Physical Activity and Its Influence on Performance: Are Chronotype and Exercise Timing Affect?

Time for Exercise? Exercise and Its Influence on the Skeletal Muscle Clock

Skeletal muscle BMAL1 is necessary for transcriptional adaptation of local and peripheral tissues in response to endurance exercise training

Effects of time-restricted exercise on activity rhythms and exercise-induced adaptations in the heart

More than the clock: distinct regulation of muscle function and metabolism by PER2 and RORα

Diurnal Preference Predicts Phase Differences in Expression of Human Peripheral Circadian Clock Genes

In Athletes, the Diurnal Variations in Maximum Oxygen Uptake Are More Than Twice as Large as the Day-to-Day Variations

The circadian clock influences heart performance.