Comparative Performance of Multiple Linear Regression and Biotic Ligand Models for Estimating the Bioavailability of Copper in Freshwater

Kevin V. Brix,Lucinda Tear,Robert C. Santore,Kelly Croteau,David K. DeForest
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/etc.5012
2021-05-08
Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry
Abstract:<p>An increasing number of metal bioavailability models are available for use in setting regulations and conducting risk assessments in aquatic systems. Selection of the most appropriate model is dependent on the user's needs, but will always benefit from an objective, comparative assessment of the performance of available models. In 2017, an expert workshop developed procedures for assessing metal bioavailability models. The current study applies these procedures to evaluate the performance of Biotic Ligand Models (BLMs) and Multiple Linear Regression models (MLRs) for copper. We find that the procedures recommended by the expert workshop generally provide a robust series of metrics for evaluating model performance. However, we recommend some modifications to the analysis of model residuals as the current method is insensitive to relatively large differences in residual patterns when comparing models. We also provide clarification on details of the evaluation procedure which, if not applied correctly, could mischaracterize model performance. We found that acute Cu MLR and BLM performance is quite comparable, though there are differences in performance on a species‐specific basis and in the resulting WQC as a function of water chemistry. In contrast, the chronic Cu MLR performed distinctly better than the BLM. Observed differences in performance are due to the smaller effects of hardness and pH on chronic Cu toxicity compared to acute Cu toxicity. These differences are captured in the chronic MLR model but not the chronic BLM which only adjusts for differences in organism sensitivity. In general, we continue to recommend concurrent development of both modeling approaches as they provide useful comparative insights into the strengths, limitations, and predictive capabilities of each model.</p><p>This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.</p>
environmental sciences,toxicology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?