Access to justice and the need for a holistic approach to the delivery of legal aid services in developing countries: Lessons from South Africa

David McQuoid-Mason
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41020-020-00126-1
2020-10-01
Jindal Global Law Review
Abstract:Legal Aid South Africa, in its previous incarnation as the Legal Aid Board, was established in 1969, and began operating in 1971. During the apartheid era the scheme had a very limited budget, and most of it was spent on civil matters, mainly serving the ruling minority white population. The mode of delivery chosen was the judicare model that has been used by many post-colonial Commonwealth countries, and was modelled on the initial England and Wales legal aid scheme in the United Kingdom that referred cases to private lawyers instead of employing full-time legal aid lawyers. Gradually, the national legal aid budget in South Africa was increased and more emphasis was placed on criminal rather than civil cases. After the introduction of a democratic Constitution in 1994, there were overwhelming demands for legal representation in criminal matters as a result of the constitutional safeguards regarding arrested, detained, and accused persons. This was because, like in many other Commonwealth developing countries, the majority of such persons arrested, detained, or accused were poor and could not afford legal representation. The huge increase in the volume of criminal cases requiring defence lawyers made the judicare system unsustainable. As a result, pilot projects were introduced to test a public defender model that included qualified lawyers in public defender offices and law intern public defenders in legal aid-funded law clinics. As is common experience in other countries, the pilot public defender model proved to be much more cost-effective and easier to manage than the judicare system. This led to a holistic approach by Legal Aid South Africa that has evolved into justice centres that incorporate qualified public defenders, law intern public defenders, and paralegals, as well as the use of private lawyers and cooperation agreements with public interest law firms, university law clinics, and paralegal organisations in cases that cannot be handled by the public defender offices. This article deals with the evolution of the holistic approach in South Africa and how the different entities involved operate.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?