Abstract:The enactment of Law Number 11 of 2020 concerning Job Creation and Government Regulation Number 35 of 2021 raises legal problems in the form of conflicts of norms and has not reflected legal protection in the theory of legal objectives that are fair, certain, and beneficial. In the event of termination of employment for outsourced workers / laborers with a certain time work agreement within the contract period, Article 62 of Law Number 13 of 2003 concerning Manpower expressly requires the party who terminates the employment relationship within the contract period to providing compensation in the amount of workers/ laborers' wages until the deadline for the expiration of the term of the employment agreement, while in Article 61A of Law Number 11 of 2020 concerning Job Creation requires employers to provide compensation money whose amount is calculated based on the period of a certain time work agreement that has been implemented by the Worker/Labor. The problem in this study is how legal protection for outsourced workers / laborers due to Termination of Employment in the contract period and what is the concept of legal protection for outsourced workers / laborers due to Termination of Employment in the contract period. This research is a normative juridical research, namely research that examines the study of documents, namely using various legal materials such as: legislation, legal theory, case studies, court decisions and in the form of opinions of scholars (doctrine). The problem approach used in this study, using a statutory approach (Statute approach), conceptual approach (Conceptual approach), philosophical approach (Philosophical approach) and comparative approach (comparative approach) in different countries. In this study, the theory of the welfare state and the theory of legal protection as an analysis knife against the formulation of the first problem, while the theory of legal objectives and the theory of agreements as an analysis knife against the formulation of the second problem. From the results of this study, it was concluded that the legal protection for outsourced workers / workers due to termination of work in the contract period is not optimal and conflicts with each other because in Article 62 of Law Number 13 of 2003 concerning Manpower only provides compensation money in the amount of workers / laborers' wages with a certain time work agreement until the deadline for the expiration of the term of the employment agreement (the remaining contract period), while in Article 61A of Law Number 11 of 2020 concerning Job Creation requires employers to provide compensation money whose amount is calculated based on the period of a certain time work agreement that has been implemented by the worker / laborer (the contract period that has been lived), s It does not cause legal uncertainty that leads to injustice for both outsourcing service providers and outsourced workers/laborers. In addition, normatively as stipulated in Law Number 13 of 2003 concerning Manpower, Law Number 11 of 2020 concerning Job Creation and Government Regulation Number 35 of 2021. The concept of legal protection for outsourced workers/laborers due to termination of employment in the contract period , among others, can be implemented with an employment agreement between workers/laborers and outsourcing companies on the basis of an indefinite time work agreement, but if the work agreement between the worker/laborer and the outsourcing company on the basis of an indefinite time work agreement then the principle of transfer of protection for workers / laborers must be applied in the event that the employer company appoints a new outsourcing company and the new outsourcing company is obliged to accept the transfer of workers/laborers from the old outsourcing company, whose object of work remains and the previously existing work agreement must be continued without changing the existing provisions in the agreement, unless changes are made to increase profits for their workers/laborers due to increased experience and length of service. Then it is necessary to form special institutions such as in the UK, ACAS (Advisory, Concilitation and Arbitration Service) who become supervisors in the field of labor so that when there is a violation committed by the company to outsourced workers / laborers, through the ACAS institution can provide fair protection to outsourced workers/laborers and in the event of termination of employment of outsourced workers / laborers, the Industrial Relations Court can decide as an unlawful act and the outsourcing company must find a job replacement for the outsourced workers/laborers who experience termination during the contract period and who are notable need to establish a special Law regulating outsourcing.

SEVERAL CONCEPTUAL ERRORS IN THE JOB CREATION LAW IN THE LIGHT OF THE SCIENCE OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW

ANALYZING REGULATORY REFORM IN FOREIGN INVESTMENT THROUGH THE OMNIBUS LAW DRAFT OF LAW

Omnibus Law Undang-Undang Cipta Kerja dalam Perspektif Sosiologi Hukum

Indonesia’s Omnibus Law and Protection of Labor Rights

Critical Review on New Indonesia Law on Labour Rights

THE ROLE OF OMNIBUS LAW IMPLEMENTATION ON THE WOMEN WORKERS PROTECTION: AN DESCRIPTIVE ANALYSIS OF LABOR LAW IN INDONESIA

Juridic Review Consumer Protection Perspective of Copyright Law (Omnibus Law) and Consumer Protection Law

Job Creation Law’s Risks Towards Investment Efficiency and Business Convenience Regarding The Environment

Risk-Based Business License and Problems Arising After The Job Creation ACT

THE LEGAL CONSEQUENCES OF THE GOVERNMENT’S POLICY OF ATTRACTING FOREIGN INVESTORS BASED ON THE OMNIBUS LAW

Reviewing Constitutional Court Decision Number 91/PUU-XVIII/2020 Regarding Formal Review of Job Creation Act: a Progressive Law Perspective

The Ratification of Omnibus Law: A Sign of Democratic Deconsolidation in Indonesia

The Dynamics of the Elements of Abuse of Authority in the Authority of the Administrative Court After the Enactment of the Latest Job Creation Law

PLAIN LANGUAGE INTERVENTION TO IMPROVE PUBLIC UNDERSTANDING OF LEGAL LANGUAGE: DESCRIPTIVE ANALYSIS OF CONTROVERSIAL ARTICLES IN THE JOB CREATION LAW

Marine and Fisheries Development Policy After the Enactment of the Job Creation Act

The Changing of Environmental Approval Administrative Law Perspective

Legal protection for outsourced workers/laborers due to termination of employment during the contract period

KARAKTERISTIK PERIZINAN BERUSAHA BERDASARKAN UU NOMOR 6 TAHUN 2023 TENTANG PENETAPAN PERPU NOMOR 2 TAHUN 2022 TENTANG CIPTA KERJA MENJADI UNDANG-UNDANG

Workers’ Rights on Omnibus Law Seen from Islamic Perspective in The Context of Maqasid Syariah

The Compliance of Regional Autonomy with State Administrative Court Decisions

LEGITIMACY OF A FIXED-TERM EMPLOYMENT CONTRACT BASED ON REMOTE WORK CONCEPT FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF THE JOB CREATION ACT