Preliminary Exploration of the Application of Vesical Imaging‐Reporting and Data System ( VI‐RADS ) in Post‐treatment Patients With Bladder Cancer: A Prospective Single‐Center Study
Bohong Cao,Qing Li,Peirong Xu,Weijie Chen,Xiaoyi Hu,Chenchen Dai,Yingchan Shan,Yuqin Ding,Wei Mao,Kai Liu,Pu‐Yeh Wu,Weiling Sun,Shengxiang Rao,Mengsu Zeng,Shuai Jiang,Jianjun Zhou
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.27807
IF: 4.4
2021-06-28
Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Abstract:<section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Background</h3><p>Vesical Imaging-Reporting and Data System (VI-RADS) has been shown to be effective in diagnosing muscle invasion of bladder cancer (BC) in primary patients.</p></section><section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Purpose</h3><p>To evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of VI-RADS in a BC target population which included post-treatment patients, and to determine the repeatability.</p></section><section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Study Type</h3><p>Prospective.</p></section><section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Population</h3><p>Seventy-three patients (42 with primary BC, 31 with post-treatment BC).</p></section><section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Field Strength/Sequence</h3><p>3.0 T MRI with propeller fast spin-echo T<sub>2</sub>WI, echo planer imaging diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), and dynamic contrast-enhanced imaging (DCEI). </p></section><section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Assessment</h3><p>VI-RADS scores were independently assessed by five radiologists with different levels of experience. The diagnostic efficiency in each group (primary and post-treatment) and of each radiologist was assessed.</p></section><section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Statistical Tests</h3><p>Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV), and area under the curve (AUC) in receiver operating characteristic curve analysis were calculated to evaluate VI-RADS diagnostic performance. Interobserver agreement was assessed using weighted Kappa statistics. A <i>P</i> value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. </p></section><section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Results</h3><p>At the corresponding cut-off, AUC values of three groups range from 0.936 to 0.947 and AUC values of five observers range from 0.901 to 0.963. There was no significant difference between the AUCs in the primary and post-treatment groups (<i>P</i> = 0.870). The cut-off of the whole group and the post-treatment group was ≥4, and the cut-off of the primary group was ≥3. The Kappa values of interobserver agreements range from 0.709 to 0.923. </p></section><section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Conclusions</h3><p>After expanding the target population to include post-treatment patients, VI-RADS still has good diagnostic efficacy and repeatability. VI-RADS could potentially be a preoperative staging tool for post-treatment patients.</p></section><section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Level of Evidence</h3><p>1</p></section><section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Technical Efficacy Stage</h3><p>2</p></section>
radiology, nuclear medicine & medical imaging