Resting state functional connectivity correlates of rumination and worry in internalizing psychopathologies

Cope Feurer,Jagan Jimmy,Fini Chang,Scott A. Langenecker,K. Luan Phan,Olusola Ajilore,Heide Klumpp
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/da.23142
IF: 8.128
2021-02-23
Depression and Anxiety
Abstract:<section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Background</h3><p>Rumination and worry are repetitive negative thinking (RNT) tendencies that contribute to the development and maintenance of internalizing psychopathologies. Accruing data suggest rumination and worry represent overlapping and unique transdiagnostic cognitive processes. Yet, prior neuroimaging research has mostly focused on rumination in depression, which points to involvement of resting‐state brain activity in default mode, executive, salience, and/or affective networks.</p></section><section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Methods</h3><p>The current study examined relations between brain activity during rest and RNT in a transdiagnostic sample. Resting‐state fMRI data was analyzed in 80 unmedicated patients with internalizing conditions. Regression analysis, controlling for anxiety and depression symptoms, was performed with seed regions implicated in default mode, executive, salience, and affective networks. Rumination and worry were assessed with standard self‐report measures.</p></section><section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Results</h3><p>Whole‐brain regression results showed more rumination and worry jointly corresponded with greater positive resting‐state functional connectivity (rsFC) between the amygdala and prefrontal regions (i.e., middle frontal gyrus, inferior frontal gyrus). Conversely, more worry (controlling for rumination) corresponded with greater negative rsFC between amygdala and precuneus. No significant results were observed for rumination alone (controlling for worry).</p></section><section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Conclusions</h3><p>Findings indicate the affective network plays a role in RNT, and distinct patterns of connectivity between amygdala and regions implicated in the executive and default mode networks were observed across patients with internalizing conditions. Results suggest different mechanisms contribute to RNT as a unitary construct and worry as a unique construct.</p></section>
psychiatry,psychology, clinical
What problem does this paper attempt to address?