Abstract:The article analyzes the recent troubled relationship between China and the Democratic People's Republic of Korea (DPRK), following the July missile tests and the October nuclear test. One would wonder if Pyongyang was countering a potential Sino-Russian-Japanese rapprochement in the making, given the fortuitous timing of the nuclear test. One could also wonder if Pyongyang was playing a “provocative role” against a relative Sino-South Korea “rapprochement,” as Pyongyang may fear being “nailed” by all this rapprochement, thus losing its own diplomatic hand eventually on the Korean Peninsula. A recap of the tumultuous history of Sino-Korean relations could offer some clues, as Pyongyang would have attempted to play traditional power politics, like in the past 320 years, whereas China would ensure not being “sucked” into conflicts and controversies over Korea, as history has shown. The entree of the United States into the Korean fray via the Portsmouth Treaty (September 1905) and the Taft-Katusra “Agreement” (July 1905) was significant, as Washington had then joined Beijing, Tokyo and Moscow in “balancing” Korean forces on the Peninsula, a fact that has not changed fundamentally till today. But there is also a fundamental shift operating, as Seoul further distances itself from Washington's hard-line policy and “shifts” toward a softer line espoused by Beijing vis-à-vis Pyongyang, clearly for commercial and affinity-related issues. Finally, Beijing could have been deemed to have scored a diplomatic triumph from its “initial disappointment” and Pyongyang's “hanran” (meaning brazen or flagrant) action, following its missile and nuclear tests; the DPRK will likely return to the Six-Party Talks in December, thus giving Beijing a decisive diplomatic triumph on the Korean peninsula.

Kim's Shock: Geopolitical Tension and Corporate Investment

The Impact of Geopolitical Risk on Stock Returns: Evidence from Inter-Korea Geopolitics

Global Risk, Domestic Framing: Coverage of the North Korean Nuclear Test by US, Chinese, and South Korean News Agencies

Mechanisms Underlying Geopolitical Shocks and Stock Price Crash Risk: Evidence from China

Geopolitical hostility and corporate innovation: Evidence from US high‐tech firms in trade sectors with China

Economic Policy Uncertainty and Corporate Investment: Evidence from China

The watchers on the wall: Inter-Korean geopolitical risk and firm risk-taking

Uncertainty and Corporate R&D Investment: Evidence from Chinese Listed Firms

The Contagion and Competitive Effects Across National Borders: Evidence from the 2016 Kumamoto Earthquakes

How does corporate investment respond to trade policy uncertainty in China? The role of political connections

The effect of geopolitical uncertainty on stock liquidity: evidence from Taiwan misfired missile event

Economic Uncertainty and Investment of Korean Firms: A Empirical Study Employing Economic Policy Uncertainty Index of Korea, US and China

The Impacts of Political Uncertainty on Asset Prices: Evidence from the Bo Scandal in China

Does geopolitical risk affect firms' idiosyncratic volatility? Evidence from China

Macroeconomic Uncertainty, Fund Demand and Corporate Investment

The Impact of the North Korean Nuclear Issue on Northeast Asian Countries and China's Responsibility

The North Korean Missile and Nuclear Crises: China's Historic and Strategic Stakes on the Korean Peninsula

What are the shocks of climate change on clean energy investment: A diversified exploration

Geopolitical Risk Revealed in International Investment and World Trade

The Influence of Crisis on Tourists’ Perceived Destination Image and Revisit Intention: an Exploratory Study of Chinese Tourists to North Korea

Chinese Tourists' Perceptions of Nuclear Crisis in North Korea