Spatio‐temporal evaluation of gridded precipitation products for the high‐altitude Indus basin

Zakir Hussain Dahri,Fulco Ludwig,Eddy Moors,Shakil Ahmad,Bashir Ahmad,Muhammad Shoaib,Irfan Ali,Muhammad Shahid Iqbal,Muhammad Saleem Pomee,Abdul Ghafoor Mangrio,Muhammad Munir Ahmad,Pavel Kabat
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.7073
2021-03-29
International Journal of Climatology
Abstract:<p>The high‐altitude Indus basin is one of the most complex and inadequately explored mountain terrains in the World, where reliable observations of precipitation are highly lacking. Therefore, spatially distributed precipitation products developed at global/regional scale are often used in several scientific disciplines. However, large uncertainties in precipitation estimates of such precipitation datasets often lead to suboptimal outcomes. In this study, performance of 27 widely used gridded precipitation products belonging to three different categories of gauge‐based, reanalysis and merged (combined) is evaluated with respect to high‐quality reference climatologies of mean monthly precipitation. Widely used statistical measures and quantitative analyses techniques are used to analyze the spatial patterns and quantitative distribution of mean monthly, seasonal and annual precipitation at sub‐regional scale. Mean annual precipitation estimates of the gridded datasets are cross validated with the corresponding adjusted streamflows using Turc‐Budyko non‐dimensional analysis. Results reveal poor to moderately good performance of the gridded datasets. Marked differences in spatiotemporal and quantitative distribution of precipitation are found among the datasets. All datasets are consistent in their patterns showing negative or dry bias in wet areas and positive or wet bias in dry areas, although considerable differences in the magnitudes of the biases are noticed at sub‐regional scale. None of the datasets is equally good for all sub‐regions due to very high spatiotemporal variability in their performance at sub‐regional scale. Gauge‐based and merged products performed better in dry regions and during monsoon season, while reanalysis products provided better estimates in wet areas and during winter months. GPCC V8, ERA5 and MSWEP2.2 are found better than their counter‐grouped datasets. Overall, ERA5 is found most acceptable for all sub‐regions, particularly at higher‐altitudes, in wet areas and during winter months.</p>
meteorology & atmospheric sciences
What problem does this paper attempt to address?