Abstract:In general, architectural design is a loosely structured, open-ended activity that includes problem definition, representation, performance evaluation, and decision making. A number of approaches have been proposed in the literature to organize, guide, and facilitate the design process. The main objective of this paper is to seek a logical and rigorous means to aid in developing an optimized design that is acceptable to the customer or user of the product. The convention design approaches heavily involve decision making, which is integral to the architectural design process and is an important element in nearly all phases of design. There is a need to reframe the decision-making process to transform and improve the design process in order for finial building to achieve the performance goals. The first step in making an effective design decision is to understand the stakeholders' and team players' (architect, engineer, client, and consultant) different preferences based on their needs, experiences, and expectations of the project. In this paper, we first provide an overview about conventional decision-making method and process, identify the existing attributes that contribute to decision making in design, and outline the obstacles present in making optimized sustainable design decisions due to the uncertainty of different stakeholders' preferences. Then, we present one case study to identify and compare different preferences among engineering students, practicing architects, and the general public, and we analyze how the three groups attribute different weight to the major design attributes. This paper provides some novel insights into a value-driven sustainable design process, and it will be one of the building blocks for creating a framework to integrate game theory into the design decision-making process, considering multiple stakeholders' perspectives and preferences for building attributes as future research tasks.

Value sensitive design as a formative framework

A Survey of Value Sensitive Design Methods

Towards Value-Sensitive Learning Analytics Design

Conceptualizing Policy in Value Sensitive Design

Improvement of Product Design Process by Knowledge Value Analysis

The Value-Sensitive Conversational Agent Co-Design Framework

Value-based Engineering for Ethics by Design

Value Sensitive Design for autonomous weapon systems – a primer

Why do we Need Norm Sensitive Design? A WEIRD Critique of Value Sensitive Approaches to Design

Twenty years of value sensitive design: a review of methodological practices in VSD projects

Knowledge Value Stream Framework For Complex Product Design Decisions

DesignFusion: Integrating Generative Models for Conceptual Design Enrichment

Eight grand challenges for value sensitive design from the 2016 Lorentz workshop

Towards the Conceptual Design of ML-enhanced Products: the UX Value Framework and the CoMLUX Design Process

Tacit Knowledge Acquisition Method for the Process of Concept Design

Knowledge Active Push for Product Design

Designing value-sensitive AI: a critical review and recommendations for socio-technical design processes

Integration of Knowledge Management in Product Design Process.

Algorithmic bias and the Value Sensitive Design approach

Value-Driven Design Process: A Systematic Decision-Making Framework Considering Different Attribute Preferences From Multiple Stakeholders

Value-Sensitive Design for Humanitarian Action: Integrating Ethical Analysis for Information and Communication Technology Innovations