Abstract:Who wants to know? Teachers, pupils and policy-makers are keen to know how best to teach and learn argumentative writing at Key Stages 2 and 3 in the National Curriculum. Difficulties with such writing are well-known. What did we find? Results showed that certain conditions have to be in place to create a climate for successful practice. These are not specific to argumentative writing but include: a writing process model in which students are encouraged to plan, draft, edit and revise their writing; self-motivation; some degree of cognitive reasoning training in addition to the natural cognitive development that takes place with maturation; peer collaboration, thus modelling a dialogue that (it is hoped) will become internal and constitute ‘thought’; and explicit and very clear explanations for students of the processes to be learned. The specific strategies identified that have contributed to successful practice in teaching and learning with regard to argumentative writing for 7–14 year olds include: ‘heuristics’, i.e. scaffolding of structures and devices that aid the composition of argumentative writing – in particular, planning, which can include examining a question, brainstorming, organizing and sequencing ideas and evaluating; planning which is extensive, elaborated and hierarchical the use of oral argument, counterargument and rebuttal to inform written argument the identification of explicit goals (including audiences) for writing teacher modelling of argumentative writing; and ‘procedural facilitation’, i.e. coaching by teaching through the process of writing argument. How did we get these results? Via an EPPI-Centre systematic review conducted in collaboration with policy-makers and teacher educators. The review question was: What is the evidence for successful practice in teaching and learning with regard to non-fiction writing (specifically argumentative writing) for 7-14 year olds? What are the implications? The results from this review suggest that more work needs to be undertaken at Key Stage 2, in particular, to develop argumentative writing by linking it to critical thinking and other approaches which aim to encourage reasoning. While argument has a more secure place in the National Curriculum than in 1990, it needs to continue to be encouraged and developed; and more research needs to be undertaken to determine how best to teach it. This report should be cited as: Andrews R, Torgerson C, Low G, McGuinn N, Robinson A (2006) Teaching argumentative non-fi ction writing to 7–14 year olds: a systematic review of the evidence of successful practice. Technical report. In: Research Evidence in Education Library. London: EPPI-Centre, Social Science Research Unit, Institute of Education, University of London.

Use of Cognitive Apprenticeship Models of Instruction to Support Middle School Students’ Construction and Critique of Written Scientific Explanations and Arguments

Constructing written scientific explanations: a conceptual analysis supporting diverse and exceptional middle- and high-school students in developing science disciplinary literacy

The Thinking Frames Approach: Improving High School Students’ Written Explanations of Phenomena in Science

Supporting Grade 5-8 Students in Constructing Explanations in Science: The Claim, Evidence, and Reasoning Framework for Talk and Writing

Using a Science Writing Heuristic to enhance learning outcomes from laboratory activities in seventh‐grade science: quantitative and qualitative aspects

Supporting Students' Construction of Scientific Explanations by Fading Scaffolds in Instructional Materials

Teaching writing to ESL graduate students: A model and an illustration

Teaching middle school students with learning disabilities argumentative writing using SRSD with technology supports

Teachers’ use of educative curriculum materials to engage students in science practices

Cognitive Modelling: A Case Study of Reading-to-write Strategy Instruction and the Development of Second Language Writing Expertise in a University English for Academic Purposes Writing Course

The Writing Achievement, Metacognitive Knowledge of Writing and Motivation of Middle-School Students with Learning Difficulties

Teaching argument writing in math class: challenges and solutions to improve the performance of 4th and 5th graders with disabilities

Reverse Engineering the Initial Steps of the Writing Process for Students with Learning Disabilities

Motivating and Shaping Scientific Argumentation in Lab Reports

Teaching science writing in an introductory lab course

Teaching Fifth-Grade Students With Specific Learning Disabilities to Explain Their Mathematical Reasoning Through Written Expression

An Interventive Collaborative Scaffolded Approach with a Writing Center On ESL Students’ Academic Writing

Middle school educators’ experiences in a cross-institutional professional development model for enhancing writing instruction

Teaching argumentative non-fiction writing to 7–14 year olds: a systematic review of the evidence of successful practice

Empowering future scientists: Mentors employ various strategies to engage students in professional science disciplinary literacy practices

Historical Reasoning among Middle School Students with Learning Differences: Exploring the Use of Multiple Sources in Writing