Abstract:Implementations of concurrent objects should guarantee linearizability and a progress property such as wait-freedom, lock-freedom, starvation-freedom, or deadlock-freedom. These progress properties describe conditions under which a method call is guaranteed to complete. However, they fail to describe how clients are affected, making it difficult to utilize them in layered and modular program verification. Also we lack verification techniques for starvation-free or deadlock-free objects. They are challenging to verify because the fairness assumption introduces complicated interdependencies among progress of threads. Even worse, none of the existing results applies to concurrent objects with partial methods, i.e., methods that are supposed not to return under certain circumstances. A typical example is the lock_acquire method, which must not return when the lock has already been acquired. In this tutorial we examine the progress properties of concurrent objects. We formulate each progress property (together with linearizability as a basic correctness requirement) in terms of contextual refinement. This essentially gives us progress-aware abstraction for concurrent objects. Thus, when verifying clients of the objects, we can soundly replace the concrete object implementations with their abstractions, achieving modular verification. For concurrent objects with partial methods, we formulate two new progress properties, partial starvation-freedom (PSF) and partial deadlock-freedom (PDF). We also design four patterns to write abstractions for PSF or PDF objects under strongly or weakly fair scheduling, so that these objects contextually refine their abstractions. Finally, we introduce a rely-guarantee style program logic LiLi for verifying linearizability and progress together for concurrent objects. It unifies thread-modular reasoning about all the six progress properties (wait-freedom, lock-freedom, starvation-freedom, deadlock-freedom, PSF and PDF) in one framework. We have successfully applied LiLi to verify starvation-freedom or deadlock-freedom of representative algorithms such as lock-coupling lists, optimistic lists and lazy lists, and PSF or PDF of lock algorithms.

A Tool for Visualizing Classic Concurrency Problems

An Interactive, Graphical CPU Scheduling Simulator for Teaching Operating Systems

Automated Dynamic Detection of Busy–wait Synchronizations

Progress of Concurrent Objects

Concurrent Data Structures Made Easy (Extended Version)

Synch: A framework for concurrent data-structures and benchmarks

Interests, Difficulties, Sentiments, and Tool Usages of Concurrency Developers: A Large-Scale Study on Stack Overflow

Exploring Time-Space trade-offs for synchronized in Lilliput

Datalog-based Scalable Semantic Diffing of Concurrent Programs

Operational Aspects of C/C++ Concurrency

Synchron -- An API and Runtime for Embedded Systems

Synchronization Aware Conflict Resolution for Runtime Monitoring Using Transactional Memory

A Survey on Exposing,Detecting and Avoiding Concurrency Bugs

Animating operating systems algorithms with XTANGO

Adaptive Synchronization and Pacing Control for Visual Interactive Simulation

Pedagogy and tools for teaching parallel computing at the sophomore undergraduate level

Automated Dynamic Concurrency Analysis for Go

Dynamic Recognition of Synchronization Operations for Improved Data Race Detection.

Responsive Parallelism with Synchronization

ActiveMonitor: Non-blocking Monitor Executions for Increased Parallelism

SPDebugger: A Fine-Grained Deterministic Debugger for Concurrency Code