The Revolving Door and Insurance Solvency Regulation

Ana-Maria Tenekedjieva

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3762573

2021-01-01

SSRN Electronic Journal

Abstract:Financial solvency regulation of the U.S. insurance industry occurs at the state level and is led by insurance commissioners who wield significant discretion over the regulatory process. I construct a novel data set of the employment history of these commissioners and find 38% of them work in the insurance industry after their term ends ("revolvers"). I find that before leaving office, revolvers are more lenient when regulating insurers' financial solvency along multiple dimensions. At an aggregate level, revolvers' lenient regulation leads to less transparency. First, in revolver-led states, insurers over-reported their solvency during the 2008 financial crisis by as much as 10%. Furthermore, their leniency leads to overly optimistic insurers' credit ratings, and consumers can be overpaying up to $27 billion in insurance premiums a year. Finally, I show that laws restricting revolvers' move to industry are effective: Revolvers become less lenient after their passing, providing evidence that revolving door incentives influence the difference in behavior.