Abstract:The American Journal of Sports Medicine, Ahead of Print. Background:There is concern that physiologic knee hyperextension may be associated with inferior outcomes after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) using hamstring tendon (HT) autografts.Purpose:To assess whether there is an association between contralateral passive preoperative knee hyperextension (≤−5°) and postoperative anterior knee laxity, subjective knee function, or revision surgery after ACLR using HT autografts.Study Design:Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.Methods:Patients without concomitant ligament injuries who underwent primary ACLR using an HT autograft at Capio Artro Clinic, Stockholm, Sweden, between January 1, 2005, and December 31, 2018, were identified. The cohort was dichotomized into the hyperextension group (≤−5°) and the no hyperextension group (>–5°) depending on preoperative contralateral passive knee extension degree. Anterior knee laxity (KT-1000 arthrometer; 134 N) was assessed preoperatively and at 6 months postoperatively. The Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) was collected preoperatively and at 1, 2, and 5 years postoperatively. Patients who underwent revision ACLR at any institution in Sweden within 5 years of the primary surgery were identified in the Swedish National Knee Ligament Registry.Results:A total of 6104 patients (53.5% male) for whom knee range of motion measurements were available were identified (hyperextension group [≤−5°]: 2350 [38.5%]; mean extension, −6.1°± 2.3° [range, −20° to −5°]; no hyperextension group [>−5°]: 3754 [61.5%]; mean extension, 0°± 1.4° [range, −4° to 15°]). There were no intergroup differences in anterior knee laxity preoperatively (hyperextension group, 3.6 ± 2.8 mm; no hyperextension group, 3.7 ± 2.7 mm; P = .24) or postoperatively (hyperextension group, 1.8 ± 2.3 mm; no hyperextension group, 1.8 ± 2.2 mm; P = .41). The only significant but nonclinically relevant intergroup differences were seen in the KOOS Symptoms subscale at the 1-year follow-up (hyperextension group, 81.4 ± 16.0; no hyperextension group, 80.3 ± 16.5; P = .03) and in the Sport and Recreation subscale at the 5-year follow-up (hyperextension group, 73.0 ± 25.6; no hyperextension group, 75.7 ± 24.3; P = .02). No other significant intergroup differences were noted preoperatively or at 1, 2, or 5 years postoperatively in any of the KOOS subscales. The overall revision ACLR rate at ≤5 years after the primary surgery was 4.9% (302 of 6104 patients). The hazard for revision ACLR in the no hyperextension group (4.5%; 170 of 3754 patients) was not significantly different from that in the hyperextension group (5.6%; 132 of 2350 patients) (hazard ratio, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.71 to −1.12; P = .34). A subsequent subanalysis showed that the hazard of revision ACLR in patients with no hyperextension was not significantly different from that of patients with ≤−10° of extension (5.8%; 27 of 467 patients) (hazard ratio, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.61 to 1.36; P = .65).Conclusion:Preoperative passive contralateral knee hyperextension (≤−5°) was not associated with postoperative anterior knee laxity, subjective knee function, or revision surgery ≤5 years after ACLR using HT autografts. Therefore, the presence of knee hyperextension alone should not be considered a contraindication per se for the use of HT autografts in ACLR.

Effect of Early Residual Laxity After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction on Long-term Laxity, Graft Failure, Return to Sports, and Subjective Outcome at 25 Years

A High Grade of Postoperative Knee Laxity Is Associated With an Increased Hazard of Revision Surgery: A Cohort Study of 4697 Patients With Primary ACL Reconstruction

Association of Remaining Anterior Knee Laxity With Inferior Outcomes After Revision ACL Reconstruction

Clinical Outcomes and Osteoarthritis at Very Long-term Follow-up After ACL Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Risk factors for anteroposterior laxity increase over time in double‐bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using hamstring autografts

Intrinsic graft laxity variation with open kinetic chain exercise after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A non-randomized controlled study

ACL Reconstruction In Laxity Patient

A slight degree of osteoarthritis appears to be present after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction compared with contralateral healthy knees at a minimum of 20 years: A systematic review of the literature

Revision ACL reconstruction with autograft: long-term functional outcomes and influencing factors

Return to Play and Long-term Participation in Pivoting Sports After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

Mid-to-long Term Clinical Outcomes and Predictors after Anterior Cruciate Ligament Re-Vision

High Revision Rate After Transphyseal ACL Reconstruction in Skeletally Immature Patients

Ligament stability two to six years after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with autogenous patellar tendon graft and participation in accelerated rehabilitation program

Factors influencing the success of anterior cruciate ligament repair with dynamic intraligamentary stabilisation

No Association of Time From Surgery With Functional Deficits in Athletes After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

Physiologic Preoperative Knee Hyperextension Is Not Associated With Postoperative Laxity, Subjective Knee Function, or Revision Surgery After ACL Reconstruction With Hamstring Tendon Autografts

Comparison of the Clinical Outcomes of Revision and Primary ACL Reconstruction: A Matched-Pair Analysis With 3-5 Years of Follow-up

Outcomes of Lateral Meniscal Oblique Radial Tear Repair Compared With Intact Meniscus After ACL Reconstruction: A Cohort Study

Reduced Knee Flexion Strength 18 Years After ACL Reconstruction With Hamstring Tendon Versus Patellar Tendon

Outcome of a Combined Anterior Cruciate Ligament and Anterolateral Ligament Reconstruction Technique With a Minimum 2-Year Follow-up

Outcomes >30 Years After Initial Nonoperative Treatment of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries