Abstract:<p>Flooded rice production is crucial to global food security, but there are associated environmental concerns. In particular, it is a significant source of methane (CH4) and nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions and a large consumer of water resources, while arsenic levels in the grain are a serious health concern. There is also a tendency to use more organic fertilisers to close nutrient cycles, posing a threat of even higher GHG emissions and grain arsenic levels. It has been shown that alternate wetting and drying (AWD) water management reduces both water use and GHG emissions, but success at maintaining yields varies. This study tested the effect of early AWD (e-AWD) versus continuous flooding (CF) water management practices on grain yields, GHG emissions and grain arsenic levels in a split-plot field experiment with organic fertilisers under organic management. The treatments included: i) farmyard manure, ii) compost, and iii) biogas digestate, alone or in combination with mineral fertiliser. The e-AWD water regime showed no difference in yield for the organic treatments. Yields significantly increased by 5–16 % in the combination treatments. Root biomass and length increased in the e-AWD treatments up to 72 and 41 %, respectively. The e-AWD water regime reduced seasonal CH4 emissions by 71–85 % for organic treatments and by 51–76 % for combination treatments; this was linked to a 15–47 % reduction in dissolved organic carbon (DOC), thereby reducing methanogenesis. N2O emissions increased by 23–305 % but accounted for <20 % of global warming potential (GWP). Area and yield-scaled GWPs were reduced by 67–83 %. The e–AWD regime altered soil redox potentials, resulting in a reduction in grain arsenic and lead concentrations of up to 66 % and 73 % respectively. Grain cadmium levels were also reduced up to 33 % in organic treatments. Structural equation modelling showed that DOC, redox, ammonium and root biomass were the key traits that regulated emissions and maintained yield. Despite the fact that the experiment was conducted in the dry-season when soil moisture conditions can be relatively well-controlled, our findings should be confirmed in multi-year studies in farmers' fields. These results suggest that in flooded rice systems receiving organic amendments or organic management, the e-AWD water regime can achieve multiple environmental and food safety objectives without compromising yield.</p>

Conservation Agriculture With Optimum Fertilizer Nitrogen Rate Reduces GWP for Rice Cultivation in Floodplain Soils

Appropriately Delayed Flooding Before Rice Transplanting Increases Net Ecosystem Economic Benefit in the Winter Green Manure-Rice Rotation System

Exploring a Suitable Nitrogen Fertilizer Rate to Reduce Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Ensure Rice Yields in Paddy Fields.

Increases in soil sequestered carbon under conservation agriculture cropping decrease the estimated greenhouse gas emissions of wetland rice using life cycle assessment

Cost-benefit Assessment for Greenhouse Gas Mitigation in Rice-Based Agriculture

Management-induced greenhouse gases emission mitigation in global rice production

Optimizing fertilizer management mitigated net greenhouse gas emissions in a paddy rice-upland wheat rotation system: A ten-year in situ observation of the Yangtze River Delta, China

Nitrogen Management to Reduce Yield-Scaled Global Warming Potential in Rice

High nitrous oxide fluxes from rice indicate the need to manage water for both long- and short-term climate impacts

Agro-technologies for greenhouse gases mitigation in flooded rice fields for promoting climate smart agriculture

Annual greenhouse gas emissions from a rice paddy with different water-nitrogen management strategies in Central China

Ways to mitigate greenhouse gas production from rice cultivation

Multiple trade‐offs between maximizing yield and minimizing greenhouse gas production in Chinese rice croplands

Estimate greenhouse gas emissions from water-saving and drought-resistance rice paddies by deNitrification-deComposition model

The effects of no-tillage and conventional tillage on greenhouse gas emissions from paddy fields with various rice varieties

Can cropland management practices lower net greenhouse emissions without compromising yield?

A combination of organic fertilizers partially substitution with alternate wet and dry irrigation could further reduce greenhouse gases emission in rice field

The impact of different fertiliser management options and cultivars on nitrogen use efficiency and yield for rice cropping in the Indo-Gangetic Plain: Two seasons of methane, nitrous oxide and ammonia emissions

Assessing impacts of alternative fertilizer management practices on both nitrogen loading and greenhouse gas emissions in rice cultivation

Substituting Partial Chemical Fertilizers with Bio-Organic Fertilizers to Reduce Greenhouse Gas Emissions in Water-Saving Irrigated Rice Fields

Reducing greenhouse gas emissions and grain arsenic and lead levels without compromising yield in organically produced rice