Participatory development of a 3D telemedicine system during COVID: The future of remote consultations
Steven Lo,Spencer Fowers,Kwame Darko,Thiago Spina,Catriona Graham,Andrea Britto,Anna Rose,David Tittsworth,Aileen McIntyre,Chris O'Dowd,Roma Maguire,Wayne Chang,David Young,Amber Hoak,Robin Young,Mark Dunlop,Levi Ankrah,Martina Messow,Opoku Ampomah,Ben Cutler,3DTM (3D Telemedicine) Collaborative research group,Roma Armstrong,Ruchi Lalwani,Ruairidh Davison,Sophie Bagnall,Whitney Hudson,Mike Shepperd,Jonny Johnson
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2022.10.012
Abstract:Background: The COVID pandemic brought the need for more realistic remote consultations into focus. 2D Telemedicine solutions fail to replicate the fluency or authenticity of in-person consultations. This research reports on an international collaboration on the participatory development and first validated clinical use of a novel, real-time 360-degree 3D Telemedicine system worldwide. The development of the system - leveraging Microsoft's Holoportation™ communication technology - commenced at the Canniesburn Plastic Surgery Unit, Glasgow, in March 2020. Methods: The research followed the VR CORE guidelines on the development of digital health trials, placing patients at the heart of the development process. This consisted of three separate studies - a clinician feedback study (23 clinicians, Nov-Dec 2020), a patient feedback study (26 patients, Jul-Oct 2021), and a cohort study focusing on safety and reliability (40 patients, Oct 2021-Mar 2022). "Lose, Keep, and Change" feedback prompts were used to engage patients in the development process and guide incremental improvements. Results: Participatory testing demonstrated improved patient metrics with 3D in comparison to 2D Telemedicine, including validated measures of satisfaction (p<0.0001), realism or 'presence' (Single Item Presence scale, p<0.0001), and quality (Telehealth Usability Questionnaire, p = 0.0002). The safety and clinical concordance (95%) of 3D Telemedicine with a face-to-face consultation were equivalent or exceeded estimates for 2D Telemedicine. Conclusions: One of the ultimate goals of telemedicine is for the quality of remote consultations to get closer to the experience of face-to-face consultations. These data provide the first evidence that Holoportation™ communication technology brings 3D Telemedicine closer to this goal than a 2D equivalent.