Prediction of plasma ctDNA fraction and prognostic implications of liquid biopsy in advanced prostate cancer
Nicolette M. Fonseca,Corinne Maurice-Dror,Cameron Herberts,Wilson Tu,William Fan,Andrew J. Murtha,Catarina Kollmannsberger,Edmond M. Kwan,Karan Parekh,Elena Schönlau,Cecily Q. Bernales,Gráinne Donnellan,Sarah W. S. Ng,Takayuki Sumiyoshi,Joanna Vergidis,Krista Noonan,Daygen L. Finch,Muhammad Zulfiqar,Stacy Miller,Sunil Parimi,Jean-Michel Lavoie,Edward Hardy,Maryam Soleimani,Lucia Nappi,Bernhard J. Eigl,Christian Kollmannsberger,Sinja Taavitsainen,Matti Nykter,Sofie H. Tolmeijer,Emmy Boerrigter,Niven Mehra,Nielka P. van Erp,Bram De Laere,Johan Lindberg,Henrik Grönberg,Daniel J. Khalaf,Matti Annala,Kim N. Chi,Alexander W. Wyatt
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-45475-w
IF: 16.6
2024-02-28
Nature Communications
Abstract:Abstract No consensus strategies exist for prognosticating metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). Circulating tumor DNA fraction (ctDNA%) is increasingly reported by commercial and laboratory tests but its utility for risk stratification is unclear. Here, we intersect ctDNA%, treatment outcomes, and clinical characteristics across 738 plasma samples from 491 male mCRPC patients from two randomized multicentre phase II trials and a prospective province-wide blood biobanking program. ctDNA% correlates with serum and radiographic metrics of disease burden and is highest in patients with liver metastases. ctDNA% strongly predicts overall survival, progression-free survival, and treatment response independent of therapeutic context and outperformed established prognostic clinical factors. Recognizing that ctDNA-based biomarker genotyping is limited by low ctDNA% in some patients, we leverage the relationship between clinical prognostic factors and ctDNA% to develop a clinically-interpretable machine-learning tool that predicts whether a patient has sufficient ctDNA% for informative ctDNA genotyping (available online: https://www.ctDNA.org ). Our results affirm ctDNA% as an actionable tool for patient risk stratification and provide a practical framework for optimized biomarker testing.
multidisciplinary sciences