Abstract:Background: Two characteristics of commonly used outcomes in medical research are zero inflation and non-negative integers; examples include the number of hospital admissions or emergency department visits, where the majority of patients will have zero counts. Zero-inflated regression models were devised to analyze this type of data. However, the performance of zero-inflated regression models or the properties of data best suited for these analyses have not been thoroughly investigated. Methods: We conducted a simulation study to evaluate the performance of two generalized linear models, negative binomial and zero-inflated negative binomial, for analyzing zero-inflated count data. Simulation scenarios assumed a randomized controlled trial design and varied the true underlying distribution, sample size, and rate of zero inflation. We compared the models in terms of bias, mean squared error, and coverage. Additionally, we used logistic regression to determine which data properties are most important for predicting the best-fitting model. Results: We first found that, regardless of the rate of zero inflation, there was little difference between the conventional negative binomial and its zero-inflated counterpart in terms of bias of the marginal treatment group coefficient. Second, even when the outcome was simulated from a zero-inflated distribution, a negative binomial model was favored above its ZI counterpart in terms of the Akaike Information Criterion. Third, the mean and skewness of the non-zero part of the data were stronger predictors of model preference than the percentage of zero counts. These results were not affected by the sample size, which ranged from 60 to 800. Conclusions: We recommend that the rate of zero inflation and overdispersion in the outcome should not be the sole and main justification for choosing zero-inflated regression models. Investigators should also consider other data characteristics when choosing a model for count data. In addition, if the performance of the NB and ZINB regression models is reasonably comparable even with ZI outcomes, we advocate the use of the NB regression model due to its clear and straightforward interpretation of the results.

A zero altered Poisson random forest model for genomic-enabled prediction

A Multivariate Poisson Deep Learning Model for Genomic Prediction of Count Data

Random Forest for Genomic Prediction

A Penalized Regression Method for Genomic Prediction Reduces Mismatch between Training and Testing Sets

Predicting the multivariate zero‐inflated counts: A novel model averaging method under Pearson loss

A graph model for genomic prediction in the context of a linear mixed model framework

Mapping QTL controlling count traits with excess zeros and ones using a zero‐and‐one‐inflated generalized Poisson regression model

Network analysis for count data with excess zeros

A marker weighting approach for enhancing within-family accuracy in genomic prediction

Genome-enabled prediction through quantile random forest for complex traits

A Non-Parametric Method for Building Predictive Genetic Tests on High-Dimensional Data

A comprehensive assessment of hurdle and zero-inflated models for single cell RNA-sequencing analysis

Evaluation of negative binomial and zero-inflated negative binomial models for the analysis of zero-inflated count data: application to the telemedicine for children with medical complexity trial

Exploring the potential of incremental feature selection to improve genomic prediction accuracy

Genome‐based prediction of Bayesian linear and non‐linear regression models for ordinal data

Modeling Zero-inflated Count Data Using Generalized Poisson and Ordinal Logistic Regression Models in Medical Research

A simulation study of the performance of statistical models for count outcomes with excessive zeros

Genomic Bayesian Prediction Model for Count Data with Genotype × Environment Interaction

Zero-inflated Beta distribution regression modeling

A New Regression Model for the Analysis of Overdispersed and Zero-Modified Count Data

Variance Components Genetic Association Test for Zero-inflated Count Outcomes