Abstract:Industrial decarbonization requires substantial electricity and grid infrastructure. Policies are developed and significant funds are being directed to decarbonize electricity generation and incentivize investments in renewable energy. Expansion of the transmission grid, however, is lagging. Even though grid capacity limits may be critical only for a few hours annually, industries ready to make large energy-intensive decarbonization investments may be refused grid connection due to security-of-supply requirements. We demonstrate that industrial flexibility can alleviate grid congestions and increase grid reliability. In low CO 2 -intensity power grids, this can increase the pace of decarbonization of heavy industries via electrification. By aligning industrial processes with grid load, peak demand can be reduced, facilitating faster sector decarbonization. Our study presents a bottom-up model of the demand-side flexibility of energy intensive processes in heavy industries (chemicals, cement and metals). Applying this to a Norwegian industry region, combined with power flow analysis, the flexibility reduces strain on transmission grids during peak demand, reducing grid overload hours by 90%. Activating industrial flexibility incurs significant operational costs, primarily determined by the most stringent processes. We estimate a unit cost of 111–210 € per MWh for flexibility of the industry sectors considered, comparable to other grid reinforcement alternatives but with significantly reduced time for realization. In the investigated transmission grid, 339 MW of new electrification measures can be accommodated, allowing for decarbonization measures representing 16% of the annual CO 2 -emissions of the industries. Our findings emphasize the importance of encouraging more flexible processes in heavy industries to accelerate decarbonization by electrification in low-carbon power grids.

Industrial Flexibility as Demand Side Response for Electrical Grid Stability

On the Impact of Flexibility on Demand-Side Management: Understanding the Need for Consumer-Oriented Demand Response Programs

Where to Market Flexibility? Optimal Participation of Industrial Energy Systems in Balancing-Power, Day-Ahead, and Continuous Intraday Electricity Markets

Modeling flexibility in electric power market

Efficient distribution grid flexibility provision through model-based MV grid and model-less LV grid approach

Extended Residential Power Management Interface for Flexibility Communication and Uncertainty Reduction for Flexibility System Operators

Optimizing the Marketing of Flexibility for a Virtual Battery in Day-Ahead and Balancing Markets: A Rolling Horizon Case Study

Flexibility Analysis for Smart Grid Demand Response

Profitability analysis on demand-side flexibility: A review

Flexibility provision of residential energy hubs with demand response applications

Demand-side Flexibility in Smart Grid

Demand-Side Flexibility in Power Systems, Structure, Opportunities, and Objectives: A Review for Residential Sector

Demand-Side Flexibility in Power Systems: A Survey of Residential, Industrial, Commercial, and Agricultural Sectors

Multi-Period Flexibility Forecast for Low Voltage Prosumers

Flexibility Procurement for Local Ancillary Services and Provider Aggregation Perimeter in Radial Distribution Systems

Faster decarbonization of heavy industries in low-carbon power grids: using process flexibility for handling grid congestions

Network-Aware Flexibility Requests for Distribution-Level Flexibility Markets

Exploiting demand-side flexibility: State-of-the-art, open issues and social perspective

Grid-Aware Provision and Activation of Fast and Slow Flexibilities from Distributed Resources in Low and Medium Voltage Grids

Efficient Operationalization of Flexibility Procurement: Market Design Analysis and Process Definition

Electricity markets regarding the operational flexibility of power plants