What To Do with the Past?: Sanskrit Literary Criticism in Postcolonial Space

V. S. Sreenath
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10781-021-09466-1
2021-03-01
Journal of Indian Philosophy
Abstract:Throughout its history of almost a millennium and a half, Sanskrit <i>kāvyaśāstra</i> was resolutely obsessed with the task of unravelling the ontology <i>kāvya</i> (literary prose and poetry). Literary theoreticians in Sanskrit, irrespective of their spatio-temporal locations, unanimously agreed upon the fact that <i>kāvya</i> was a special mode of expression (distinctly different from the ordinary form of speech) characterized by the presence of certain unique linguistic elements. Nonetheless, this did not imply that <i>kāvyaśāstra</i> was an intellectual tradition unmarked by disagreements. The real point of contention among the practitioners of Sanskrit literary theory was the prioritization of certain formal elements as the 'soul' of literature. This strong sense of intellectual disagreement on the question of what constituted the soul of <i>kāvya</i> eventually paved the way for the emergence of new frameworks of criticism and extensive scrutiny of the existing categories, thus playing a vital role in keeping this tradition alive and new.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?