Editorial: Transformational competences and the Fourth Industrial Revolution
Claude-Hélène Mayer,Rudolf M. Oosthuizen,Elisabeth Vanderheiden
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1504360
IF: 3.8
2024-12-17
Frontiers in Psychology
Abstract:The move toward the Fourth Industrial Revolution (4IR) is rapidly progressing and organisations are changing faster than ever before (Bughin et al., 2018;SAICA, 2023). It has been predicted that the workforce of machines will complete more jobs than humans in 2025 (Smith & Anderson, 2014). Others highlight that through the 4IR and especially through AI and robotics, many more jobs will be created (CNBC, 2018). The 4IR will be driven by AI, System Dynamics, Human-Machine and Machine-Machine interaction (Mayer & Oosthuizen, 2020a).New AI applications, such as chatGBT, LaMDA or BARD are leading to far-reaching changes in all learning and work contexts and require far-reaching realignments in terms of competences and skills (Kroon et al., 2021). Adoption and adjustment are critical aspects in dealing with the technological changes and the new world of work (Davis, 2022) and leaders need to focus on developing comprehensibility, manageability, and meaningfulness to cope with the radical changes and promote mental health and well-being in organisations of the 4IR (Mayer & Oosthuizen, 2020b).Many professions and organisations have to change the way the work and how work is allocated (Schwab, 2016;Manyika et al., 2017;Rotatori et al., 2021). One the one hand, the new technologies present possible opportunities and on the other hand they pose challenges and difficulties for employees and organizations in terms of skill development and adaptability (Malomane et al., 2022;Prisecaru, 2016;Schwab, 2017;Xu et al., 2018).Organisations and workspaces need to collaborate with the educational sector -and in particular higher education -to define skills and competences which individuals across cultures and in specific cultural contexts need to develop to thrive in the 4IR (Rychen, 2016). Mayer (2020) has highlighted that a globalised 4IR workforce needs to develop key concepts, such as creativity, positive emotions, solution-focus and meaning-making in the 4IR to be sustainable and successful. The author further points out that these key concepts need to be developed in educational institutions and required by leaders of the 4IR, as precious skills.According to the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) (2023), there is a need to develop the following three transformational skills to shape a desired future:Creating new values, balancing tensions, and dilemmas, and taking responsibility. To create new values, individuals need to ask questions, collaborate with others and try to think outside the box to find innovative solutions (Bentley, 2017;Grayling, 2017). This links a sense of purpose with critical thinking and creativity. In an interdependent world, individuals need to be able to balance conflicting or seemingly incompatible thinking and demands and become comfortable with complexity and ambiguity, taking responsibility for their actions and have a strong moral compass for critical reflection, cooperation with others, and respect for the environment and humanity (Melville & Robert, 2020).The discourse surrounding the 4IR indeed often presents it as a global phenomenon, characteried by the convergence of digital, physical, and biological technologies and their impact on various aspects of society, economy, and culture. Berger and Frey (2015), as well as Schwab (2016), have contributed significantly to this narrative, emphasizing the widespread nature of technological advancements and their transformative effects on industries and societies worldwide. However, it's essential to acknowledge the perspective that views the 4IR through a cultural lens. Oosthuizen and Mayer (2019) highlight that while the technological advancements associated with the 4IR may have global reach, their adoption, adaptation, and impact can vary significantly across different cultural contexts. Cultural factors such as values, norms, traditions, and governance structures can shape how societies engage with and are affected by these technological changes. This perspective underscores the importance of considering local contexts and cultural nuances when discussing the 4IR and its implications.It suggests that while there may be overarching trends and developments at the global level, the way these manifest and are experienced can differ significantly from one culture to another. This recognition prompts a more nuanced understanding of the 4IR and the need for tailored approaches to address its opportunities and challenges in different cultural settings. The editors wish all of the readers of this special issue an interesting read and hope to stimulate contemporary and future discourses on the 4IR!
psychology, multidisciplinary