The effectiveness of a protocol without routine radiographs for follow-up of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients (CURVE): a study protocol
Jurre T F Baetsen,Miranda L Hooff,Pepijn Bisseling,Johanna M Van Dongen,Dineke G Van de Fliert,Eric Hoebink,Diederik H R Kempen,Joost P H J Rutges,Tom P C Schlösser,Hanneke M Van West,Philip J Van der Wees,Paul C Willems,Marinus De Kleuver,Dutch AIS consortium,E Heerdt,M van den Boogaart,E Jacobs,P van Hugten,L W van Rhijn,M C Kruyt,J Renkens,F Joor,M Reijman,S Pols,H Olderkamp,P Horsting,D Schrander,L de Klerk,T Stevens,M C Altena,M L M van der Hulst,A J Rasker,M Nieuwenhuijse,J de Haan,I Wiljouw,B J van Royen,A Stadhouder,A K Mostert,M P Cornelissen,R Munnik,G B van Solinge,D R de Boer,C Faber,G J F J Bos,F H Wapstra,A Spoor,R Geuze,S Bossers,H Graat,K Slot,E J Meurs,J L Benner,P P A Vergroesen,W J Pluymakers,E Kraaneveld,P Haen,W J Marijnissen,R Hoogendoorn,K Ottink,M van der Poel,P B de Witte,H Sonneveld,T D Berendes,M C Meander,J Nieuwenhuis,B J Blom,R Zwiers,J van Susante,L de Jong,W M Bakker,P G Lammers,W A Meijwaard,J H van Linge,G H Moens,Y M den Hartog,J Lutjeboer
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2340/17453674.2024.40904
2024-06-17
Abstract:Background and purpose: Current follow-up protocols for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) are based on consensus and consist of regular full-spine radiographs to monitor curve progression and surgical complications. Consensus exists to avoid inappropriate use of radiographs in children. It is unknown whether a standard radiologic follow-up (S-FU) approach is necessary or if a patient-empowered follow-up (PE-FU) approach can reduce the number of radiographs without treatment consequences. Methods and analyses: A nationwide multicenter pragmatic randomized preference trial was designed for 3 follow-up subgroups (pre-treatment, post-brace, post-surgery) to compare PE-FU and S-FU. 812 patients with AIS (age 10-18 years) will be included in the randomized trial or preference cohorts. Primary outcome is the proportion of radiographs with a treatment consequence for each subgroup. Secondary outcomes consist of the proportion of patients with delayed initiation of treatment due to non-routine radiographic follow-up, radiation exposure, societal costs, positive predictive value, and interrelation of clinical assessment, quality of life, and parameters for initiation of treatment during follow-up. Outcomes will be analyzed using linear mixed-effects models, adjusted for relevant baseline covariates, and are based on intention-to-treat principle. Study summary: (i) a national, multicenter pragmatic randomized trial addressing the optimal frequency of radiographic follow-up in patients with AIS; (ii) first study that includes patient-empowered follow-up; (iii) an inclusive study with 3 follow-up subgroups and few exclusion criteria representative for clinical reality; (iv) preference cohorts alongside to amplify generalizability; (v) first study conducting an economic evaluation comparing both follow-up approaches.