Is the future female for turtles? Climate change and wetland configuration predict sex ratios of a freshwater species
H. Patrick Roberts,Lisabeth L. Willey,Michael T. Jones,Thomas S. B. Akre,David I. King,John Kleopfer,Donald J. Brown,Scott W. Buchanan,Houston C. Chandler,Phillip deMaynadier,Melissa Winters,Lori Erb,Katharine D. Gipe,Glenn Johnson,Kathryn Lauer,Eric B. Liebgold,Jonathan D. Mays,Jessica R. Meck,Joshua Megyesy,Joel L. Mota,Nathan H. Nazdrowicz,Kevin J. Oxenrider,Molly Parren,Tami S. Ransom,Lindsay Rohrbaugh,Scott Smith,Derek Yorks,Brian Zarate
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.16625
IF: 11.6
2023-02-02
Global Change Biology
Abstract:Climate change and land‐use change are leading drivers of biodiversity decline, affecting demographic parameters that are important for population persistence. For example, scientists have speculated for decades that climate change may skew adult sex ratios in taxa that express temperature‐dependent sex determination (TSD), but limited evidence exists that this phenomenon is occurring in natural settings. For species that are vulnerable to anthropogenic land‐use practices, differential mortality among sexes may also skew sex ratios. We sampled the spotted turtle (Clemmys guttata), a freshwater species with TSD, across a large portion of its geographic range (Florida to Maine), to assess the environmental factors influencing adult sex ratios. We present evidence that suggests recent climate change has skewed the adult sex ratio of spotted turtles, with samples following a pattern of increased female‐bias concomitant with warming trends, but only within the warmest areas sampled. At intermediate temperatures, there was no relationship with climate, while in the coolest areas we found the opposite pattern, with samples becoming more male‐biased with increasing temperatures. These patterns might be explained in part by variation in relative adaptive capacity via phenotypic plasticity in nest site selection. Our findings also suggest that spotted turtles have a context‐dependent and multi‐scale relationship with land use. We observed a negative relationship between male proportion and the amount of crop cover (within 300 m) when wetlands were less spatially aggregated. However, when wetlands were aggregated, sex ratios remained consistent. This pattern may reflect sex‐specific patterns in movement that render males more vulnerable to mortality from agricultural machinery and other threats. Our findings highlight the complexity of species' responses to both climate change and land use, and emphasize the role that landscape structure can play in shaping wildlife population demographics.
environmental sciences,biodiversity conservation,ecology