Abstract:Introduction: The Multiple Errands Test (MET) is a complex, performance-based assessment that is useful for characterising the impact of impairments of executive function on everyday activities. However, performance variance amongst those without neurological pathology, and the impact of non-cognitive factors on this, requires further investigation. Methods: This was a cross-sectional analytic study, conducted with a convenience sample of 40 neurologically intact community-dwelling Australian adults. Participants completed a hospital or shopping centre version of the MET, where their Performance Efficiency, Task Completions and Rule Breaks were recorded. Non-cognitive factors of interest were demographic (age, sex and education), psychological (measured with the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale and self-ratings of test anxiety) and assessment-related (assessment site, self-reported site familiarity and observed strategy use). MET performance was analysed using descriptive statistics. A series of standard multiple and binary logistic regression analyses examined the relationships between MET performance and non-cognitive factors. Results: Most participants (n = 35, 87.5%) completed at least 10 of the 12 prescribed tasks and broke an average of four rules (SD = 2.36). They achieved an average performance efficiency rating of 0.75/1 (SD = 0.15), suggesting variability in the extent to which participants made non-essential location stops and/or failed to complete tasks whilst at an essential location. The assessment site and participant site familiarity had a statistically significant (p < 0.05) impact on Performance Efficiency and Task Completion scores, and psychological factors had a statistically significant (p < 0.05) relationship with Rule Breaks. Conclusion: Findings suggest that the impact of factors other than cognition should be considered when interpreting MET performance. The assessment site and participant site familiarity may contribute to significant variability in Performance Efficiency scores. Clinicians should also be aware of the potential impact of these assessment-related factors on Task Completions and psychological distress on Rule Breaks.

A complementary methodology to assess time management behaviors

An Issue of Public Affairs Management: the Effect of Time Slack and Need for Cognition on Prediction of Task Completion

Time management profiles of college students and its relationship to sociodemographic and psychological factors

Proposal of an effective time management system

Assessment of time management skills: psychometric properties of the Swedish version

Using Instructor-Implemented Interventions to Improve College-Student Time Management

Time management: Test of a process model.

How Did It Get So Late So Soon? The Effects of Time Management Knowledge and Practice on Students’ Time Management Skills and Academic Performance

Metacognitive planning: Development and validation of an online measure.

Digital assessment of working memory and processing speed in everyday life: Feasibility, validation, and lessons-learned

A Structural Framework for Effective Time Management in Dynamic Work Environments

A comparison between the time-management skills and academic performance of mature and traditional-entry university students

The Spheres & Shield Maze Task: A Virtual Reality Serious Game for the Assessment of Risk Taking in Decision Making

Multiple sclerosis functional tests and their comparability with self-administered values: A pilot study

Testing for Aberrant Behavior in Response Time Modeling

Further investigations into performance variance on the Multiple Errands Test

Assessing time-based prospective memory online: A comparison study between laboratory-based and web-based testing

Positive time use: a missing link between time perspective, time management, and well-being

Temporal bisection task as a predictor of cognitive deficits

Validity of Computer Based Administration of Cognitive Assessments compared to Traditional Paper-based Administration

Caught Between a Clock and a Hard Place: Temporal Ambivalence and Time (Mis)management in Teams