Application of Combining YOLO Models and 3D GPR Images in Road Detection and Maintenance

Zhen Liu,Wenxiu Wu,Xingyu Gu,Shuwei Li,Lutai Wang,Tianjie Zhang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13061081
IF: 5
2021-03-12
Remote Sensing
Abstract:Improving the detection efficiency and maintenance benefits is one of the greatest challenges in road testing and maintenance. To address this problem, this paper presents a method for combining the you only look once (YOLO) series with 3D ground-penetrating radar (GPR) images to recognize the internal defects in asphalt pavement and compares the effectiveness of traditional detection and GPR detection by evaluating the maintenance benefits. First, traditional detection is conducted to survey and summarize the surface conditions of tested roads, which are missing the internal information. Therefore, GPR detection is implemented to acquire the images of concealed defects. Then, the YOLOv5 model with the most even performance of the six selected models is applied to achieve the rapid identification of road defects. Finally, the benefits evaluation of maintenance programs based on these two detection methods is conducted from economic and environmental perspectives. The results demonstrate that the economic scores are improved and the maintenance cost is reduced by $49,398/km based on GPR detection; the energy consumption and carbon emissions are reduced by 792,106 MJ/km (16.94%) and 56,289 kg/km (16.91%), respectively, all of which indicates the effectiveness of 3D GPR in pavement detection and maintenance.
environmental sciences,imaging science & photographic technology,remote sensing,geosciences, multidisciplinary
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problem that this paper attempts to solve is to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of road detection and maintenance. Specifically, traditional road detection methods have the following problems: 1. **Incomplete information**: Traditional detection methods can only obtain the information on the road surface and are unable to detect internal defects. 2. **Low efficiency**: Traditional methods rely on manual inspections and judgments, which are inefficient and error - prone. 3. **High cost**: Due to the limitations of traditional methods, the cost of road maintenance is relatively high. 4. **Lack of automation and quantitative assessment**: Existing technologies have deficiencies in data post - processing and evaluation criteria, and it is difficult to achieve automatic detection and quantitative assessment. To solve these problems, this research proposes a method that combines the YOLO model and 3D ground - penetrating radar (GPR) images to identify internal defects in asphalt pavements and evaluate the maintenance benefits based on these two detection methods from both economic and environmental perspectives. The specific steps include: 1. **Traditional detection**: Conduct a surface condition survey on the test section and summarize the surface conditions. 2. **GPR detection**: Use 3D GPR to obtain images of hidden defects. 3. **Application of the YOLO model**: Select the most balanced YOLOv5 model in terms of performance to quickly identify road defects. 4. **Benefit assessment**: Evaluate the maintenance benefits based on traditional detection and GPR detection from economic and environmental perspectives. Through this method, the research found that the economic benefit score based on GPR detection has increased, and the maintenance cost per kilometer has been reduced by $49,398; the energy consumption and carbon emissions have been reduced by 792,106 MJ/km (16.94%) and 56,289 kg/km (16.91%) respectively, indicating the effectiveness of 3D GPR in pavement detection and maintenance. ### Key formulas - Maintenance cost reduction: $\Delta C = 49,398 \text{ USD/km}$ - Energy consumption reduction: $\Delta E = 792,106 \text{ MJ/km}$ - Carbon emission reduction: $\Delta CO_2 = 56,289 \text{ kg/km}$ These results show that the method of combining the YOLO model and 3D GPR images can significantly improve the efficiency and effectiveness of road detection and maintenance.