Abstract:Full-scan, data-dependent acquisition (DDA), and data-independent acquisition (DIA) are the three common data acquisition modes in high resolution mass spectrometry-based untargeted metabolomics. It is an important yet underrated research topic on which acquisition mode is more suitable for a given untargeted metabolomics application. In this work, we compared the three data acquisition techniques using a standard mixture of 134 endogenous metabolites and a human urine sample. Both hydrophilic interaction and reversed-phase liquid chromatographic separation along with positive and negative ionization modes were tested. Both the standard mixture and urine sample generated consistent results. Full-scan mode is able to capture the largest number of metabolic features, followed by DIA and DDA (53.7% and 64.8% respective features fewer on average in urine than full-scan). Comparing the MS2 spectra in DIA and DDA, spectra quality is higher in DDA with average dot product score 83.1% higher than DIA in Urine(H), and the number of MS2 spectra (spectra quantity) is larger in DIA (on average 97.8% more than DDA in urine). Moreover, a comparison of relative standard deviation distribution between modes shows consistency in the quantitative precision, with the exception of DDA showing a minor disadvantage (on average 19.8% and 26.8% fewer features in urine with RSD < 5% than full-scan and DIA). In terms of data preprocessing convenience, full-scan and DDA data can be processed by well-established software. In contrast, several bioinformatic issues remain to be addressed in processing DIA data and the development of more effective computational programs is highly demanded.The Supporting Information is available free of charge at <a class="ext-link" href="/doi/10.1021/acs.analchem.9b05135?goto=supporting-info">https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.analchem.9b05135</a>.Text S-1: Detailed MS parameter settings for full-scan, DDA and DIA modes. Text S-2: Detailed parameters for processing full-scan, DDA and DIA data in MS-DIA. Text S-3: Statistical analysis used in this comparative study. Text S-4: Details of dot product calculation. Text S-5: The reasons of DDA having unique MS2 matched features undetected in DIA. Table S-1: List of metabolites in the standard mixture. Table S-2: Metabolites detected in StdMix(H). Table S-3: Metabolites detected in StdMix(L). Table S-4: Retention time and peak intensity information on metabolites detected in StdMix(H). Table S-5: Retention time and peak intensity information on metabolites detected in StdMix(L). Table S-6: Dot product of the common metabolic feature MS2 between RP(+) DDA and DIA methods from StdMix(H). Table S-7: Comparison of the statistical results generated using the MS/MS precursor ions and that using manual examination of the chromatogram in the raw data. Table S-8: Table of identified metabolites in Urine(H) samples in both RP(+) and HILIC(−) modes. Table S-9: Detailed acquisition time in each MS mode. Figure S-1. Number of statistically significant features in urine analysis. (A) total feature number, (B) MS1 annotated feature number, (C) MS2 matched feature number. Figure S-2. Illustration of chromatograms in (A) full-scan; (B) DDA; (C) DIA modes. Figure S-3. Number of total metabolic features as the function of parameter space (A) mass tolerance for constructing extracted ion chromatogram; (B) minimum peak height; (C) algorithm of chromatographic peak reconstruction (<a class="ext-link" href="/doi/suppl/10.1021/acs.analchem.9b05135/suppl_file/ac9b05135_si_001.pdf">PDF</a>)This article has not yet been cited by other publications.

Evaluation of Acquisition Modes for Semi‐Quantitative Analysis by Targeted and Untargeted Mass Spectrometry

Comparison of Full-Scan, Data-Dependent, and Data-Independent Acquisition Modes in Liquid Chromatography–Mass Spectrometry Based Untargeted Metabolomics

High-throughput Liquid Chromatography/mass Spectrometry Method for the Quantitation of Small Molecules Using Accurate Mass Technologies in Supporting Discovery Drug Screening.

Evaluation of a Commercial TIMS-Q-TOF Platform for Native Mass Spectrometry

Evaluation of Data-Dependent MS/MS Acquisition Parameters for Non-Targeted Metabolomics and Molecular Networking of Environmental Samples: Focus on the Q Exactive Platform

Comparing Targeted vs. Untargeted MS2 Data-Dependent Acquisition for Peak Annotation in LC–MS Metabolomics

Optimization of Mass Spectrometric Parameters in Data Dependent Acquisition for Untargeted Metabolomics on the Basis of Putative Assignments

Quantitative mass spectrometry methods for pharmaceutical analysis

Enhanced Resolution Triple-Quadrupole Mass Spectrometry for Fast Quantitative Bioanalysis Using Liquid Chromatography/Tandem Mass Spectrometry: Investigations of Parameters That Affect Ruggedness

A Workflow to Perform Targeted Metabolomics at the Untargeted Scale on a Triple Quadrupole Mass Spectrometer

Evaluation of significant features discovered from different data acquisition modes in mass spectrometry-based untargeted metabolomics

Towards Unbiased Evaluation of Ionization Performance in LC-HRMS Metabolomics Method Development

Liquid Chromatography-Mass Spectrometric Multiple Reaction Monitoring-Based Strategies For Expanding Targeted Profiling Towards Quantitative Metabolomics

Rapid screening methods for yeast sub‐metabolome analysis with a high‐resolution ion mobility quadrupole time‐of‐flight mass spectrometer

Liquid Chromatography-Mass Spectrometric Multiple Reaction Monitoring-Based Strategies for Expanding Targeted Profiling Towards Quantitative Metabolomics.

Hybrid Quadrupole Mass Filter Radial Ejection Linear Ion Trap and Intelligent Data Acquisition Enable Highly Multiplex Targeted Proteomics

Development and application of sequential window acquisition of all theoretical mass spectra data acquisition modes on ultra‐high‐performance liquid chromatography triple‐quadrupole/time‐of‐flight mass spectrometry for metabolic profiling of amino acids in human plasma

Application of Mass Spectrometry for Metabolite Identification

Data-Independent Acquisition for the Quantification and Identification of Metabolites in Plasma

Rapid Development of Improved Data-Dependent Acquisition Strategies

Is nontargeted data acquisition for target analysis (nDATA) in mass spectrometry a forward-thinking analytical approach?