Detrital Zircon U‐Pb Geochronology of the Xilin Group: Constraints for the Early Paleozoic Tectonic Evolution of the Songliao Massif

Tianjiao SANG,Fuping PEI,Wenliang XU,Zhiwei WANG,Ji JIAO,Jingyang WEI,Yipeng WANG
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1755-6724.14684
2021-12-01
Abstract:The Xilin Group, composed of Chenming, Laodaomiaogou, Qianshan and Wuxingzhen formations, is one of the early Paleozoic terranes in the eastern Songliao Massif and mainly consists of thick layered fine clastic and carbonate rocks. This paper presents LA–ICP–MS zircon U–Pb geochronology data of the Laodaomiaogou and Qianshan formations, and further constrains their provenance and the early Paleozoic tectonic evolution of the Songliao Massif on the eastern Central Asian Orogenic Belt. Most of the zircons from the Laodaomiaogou and Qianshan formations show magmatic oscillatory zoning and high Th/U ratios (0.26–2.41). Zircon U–Pb dating results indicate that the detrital zircons from the silty mudstone of the Laodaomiaogou Formation yielded 634 Ma, 775 Ma, 820 Ma, 880 Ma and 927 Ma peak ages, as well as multi‐episodic Archean to Paleo‐ and Meso‐proterozoic ages (1405–643 Ma), implying its deposition time is less than ∼634 Ma. Further combining with the occurrence of the early Cambrian fossils, the Laodaomiaogou Formation was deposited during the late stage of the early Cambrian (∼514 Ma). The zircons from the K‐bentonite of the Qianshan Formation showed four peak ages of 444 Ma, 471 Ma, 489 Ma and 518 Ma and the youngest age peak of 444±4 Ma (n = 6) indicate that the Qianshan Formation was deposited during the Late Ordovician. In addition, the peak ages of detrital zircons in the silty mudstone of the Qianshan Formation are 472 Ma and 498 Ma, as well as two other concordant points with <sup>207</sup>Pb/<sup>206</sup>Pb apparent ages of 1824 Ma and 1985 Ma. The dating results in this paper, together with published data, indicate the absence of the Pan‐African magmatic events in the Songliao Massif before the initial deposition of the Xilin Group, compared with those distributed widely in the Jiamusi Massif. Taken together, we concluded that the depositional provenance of the Laodaomiaogou and Qianshan formations was derived from the Songliao Massif. Furthermore, the characteristics of the detrital zircon age composition and rock association indicate that the Laodaomiaogou Formation formed in a passive continental margin environment in contrast to the Qianshan Formation which formed in an active continental margin environment. The above results also imply that the Songliao and Jiamusi massifs might have not yet collided before the Late Ordovician.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?