Phenotypic Interindividual Differences in the Dynamic Structure of Sleep in Healthy Young Adults
Akifumi Kishi,Hans PA Van Dongen
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/NSS.S392038
2023-06-24
Nature and Science of Sleep
Abstract:Akifumi Kishi, 1– 3 Hans PA Van Dongen 4, 5 1 Graduate School of Education, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan; 2 Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan; 3 Japan Science and Technology Agency, PRESTO, Saitama, Japan; 4 Sleep and Performance Research Center, Washington State University, Spokane, WA, USA; 5 Department of Translational Medicine and Physiology, Washington State University, Spokane, WA, USA Correspondence: Akifumi Kishi, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-0033, Japan, Tel +81-3-5841-3415, Fax +81-3-5841-3418, Email Introduction: Evaluating the dynamic structure of sleep may yield new insights into the mechanisms underlying human sleep physiology. Methods: We analyzed data from a 12-day, 11-night, strictly controlled laboratory study with an adaptation night, 3 iterations of a baseline night followed by a recovery night after 36 h of total sleep deprivation, and a final recovery night. All sleep opportunities were 12 h in duration (22:00– 10:00) and recorded with polysomnography (PSG). The PSG records were scored for the sleep stages: rapid eye movement (REM) sleep; non-REM (NREM) stage 1 sleep (S1), stage 2 sleep (S2), and slow wave sleep (SWS); and wake (W). Phenotypic interindividual differences were assessed using indices of dynamic sleep structure – specifically sleep stage transitions and sleep cycle characteristics – and intraclass correlation coefficients across nights. Results: NREM/REM sleep cycles and sleep stage transitions exhibited substantial and stable interindividual differences that were robust across baseline and recovery nights, suggesting that mechanisms underlying the dynamic structure of sleep are phenotypic. In addition, the dynamics of sleep stage transitions were found to be associated with sleep cycle characteristics, with a significant relationship between the length of sleep cycles and the degree to which S2-to-W/S1 and S2-to-SWS transitions were in equilibrium. Discussion: Our findings are consistent with a model for the underlying mechanisms that involves three subsystems – characterized by S2-to-W/S1, S2-to-SWS, and S2-to-REM transitions – with S2 playing a hub-like role. Furthermore, the balance between the two subsystems within NREM sleep (S2-to-W/S1 and S2-to-SWS) may serve as a basis for the dynamic regulation of sleep structure and may represent a novel target for interventions aiming to improve sleep. Keywords: polysomnography, sleep stage transitions, NREM/REM sleep cycles, ultradian rhythm, sleep phenotype Sleep is a dynamic process, 1 with the brain cycling through different sleep stages in a structured manner. Healthy human sleep displays systematic alternations between episodes of non-rapid eye movement (NREM) sleep and rapid eye movement (REM) sleep. 2 The duration of this sleep cycle, or ultradian rhythm, is 90 to 100 min on average. 3 Within each NREM sleep episode, there is usually a progression from lighter sleep (stage 1 [S1] and stage 2 [S2]) to deeper sleep (stage 3 and stage 4, or slow wave sleep [SWS]) and then back to lighter sleep. 4 Moreover, the distribution of sleep stages within the sleep cycle changes across the night. 5,6 SWS is most prominent during the first two or three sleep cycles of the night, 7 whereas REM sleep is most prominent during the later sleep cycles of nighttime sleep. 8 In healthy young adults, approximately 50% of sleep time presents as S2 sleep, which is distinct from SWS and REM sleep in terms of polysomnographic appearance, 2,9 EEG synchronization (auto-correlation), 10,11 and temporal regulation. 12,13 These dynamics interact with the homeostatic and circadian processes of sleep/wake regulation, with NREM sleep controlled primarily by the homeostatic process 7 and REM sleep under circadian and homeostatic control. 14–16 Furthermore, there is homeostatic regulation between NREM and REM sleep within and across sleep cycles, 17,18 which has been described in terms of reciprocal interaction. 19 Further complexity in dynamic sleep structure has been revealed by analyses of the first sleep cycle 20,21 and comparisons among chronotypes 22 and age groups. 23 Over the last two decades, detailed analyses of the transitions between sleep stages revealed dynamic mathematical and statistical patterns and yielded new insight into the mechanisms underlying human sleep physiology and pathophysiology. 24–29 One recent study on sleep stage transitions found that three distinct "subsystems" may underlie the -Abstract Truncated-
neurosciences,clinical neurology