Abstract:Abusive leaders affect employees’ emotions and health and produce counterproductive behaviors that cause economic damage to organizations. The literature has focused predominantly on the antecedents of abusive supervision and its negative impact, providing knowledge on mechanisms that link abusive supervision to consequences for subordinates. There has been limited research on the supervisor perspective, on the group level, and on recovery. This review makes three contributions: first, we examine the theoretical approaches used by previous research studies to understand abusive supervision. Second, we analyze the types of mechanisms that explain how and when an abusive supervision process occurs. Third, we identify and discuss applied methodologies and limitations. Based on the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analysis guidelines, and transactional well-being process perspective, we analyzed 171 empirical manuscripts and 239 samples between 2010 and July 2020. We identified a growth in abusive supervision research between 2018 and 2020 and found 101 different theories. Most of these theories view abusive supervision from a social, relational, or affective perspective, but seldom from an emotional perspective. We classified four types of mechanisms: simple relations between abusive supervision and antecedent-consequences (12), moderators (47), mediators (26), and a combination of mediators and moderators (86). We found that research has mostly been performed at the employee level or on dyads; studies that analyze the team level are rarely found. We identified two methodological problems: cross-sectional designs, which do not allow the analysis of its causality, and the increased risk of common method variance that may influence the results obtained via single-source data. In conclusion, the theories used have focused on employee perceptions, which have not enabled the broadening of the abusive supervision concept to include the supervisor’s perspective and a recovery-related perspective. Research on how and when abusive supervision occurs analyzed with complex mechanisms using emotional variables and appropriate daily methodologies has been scarce. We propose a theoretical expansion including emotional theories to uncover emotional consequences of abusive supervision and the recovery concept to provide a deeper insight into abusive supervision process. We contend that longitudinal and diary designs that include teams and supervisor levels are necessary.

Abusive Supervision and Employee Empowerment: The Moderating Role of Resilience and Workplace Friendship

Influence of Subordinates' and Supervisors' Network Positions on the Effect of Abusive Supervision

Abusive Supervision Mediates Self-Fulfilling Prophecies: the Moderating Role of Outcome Dependence

Abusive Supervision and Career Adaptability: the Role of Self-Efficacy and Coworker Support

Mitigating the Harms of Abusive Supervision on Employee Thriving: the Buffering Effects of Employees’ Social-Network Centrality

The Short-lived Benefits of Abusive Supervisory Behavior for Actors: an Investigation of Recovery and Work Engagement

Impacts of Abusive Supervision on Employee s Creativity: The Mediating role of Psychological Empowerment ‎

Investigating the effect of abusive supervision on work engagement through the role of employee creativity: the moderating effect of interpersonal communication competence

Is Abusive Supervision Always “toxic” to Work Engagement? – A Moderated Nonlinear Mediation Model

Bearing the Brunt: a Daily Diary Examination of Abusive Supervision and the Sustaining Role of Coworkers’ Support

Abusive supervision and work behaviors: The mediating role of LMX

A multistudy analysis of abusive supervision and social network service addiction on employee's job engagement and innovative work behaviour

Abusive Supervision, Thwarted Belongingness, and Workplace Safety: A Group Engagement Perspective.

Supervisees’ reactions to a concatenation of supervisors’ resource drain, ego depletion and abusive supervision

Abusive supervision and subordinate performance: Instrumentality considerations in the emergence and consequences of abusive supervision.

Abusive Supervision: A Systematic Review and New Research Approaches

Abusive Supervision and Employee Well‐Being: the Moderating Effect of Power Distance Orientation

"With a Little Help from My Friends: Abusive Supervision, Team Member Exchange, and Creativity"

Subordinate poor performance as a stressor on leader well-being: The mediating role of abusive supervision and the moderating role of motives for abuse.

Demonstrating the Psychological Aspects of Stressors and Abusive Supervision Behavior: Attainment of Sustainability Under the Rubric of Resources Theory

Abusive Supervision and Employee Dysfunctional Behavior: A Meta-analysis from Multi-foci Perspective