Abstract:Reconstructing the tree of life is an essential task in evolutionary biology. It demands accurate phylogenetic inference for both extant and extinct organisms, the latter being almost entirely dependent on morphological data. While parsimony methods have traditionally dominated the field of morphological phylogenetics, a rapidly growing number of studies are now employing probabilistic methods (maximum likelihood and Bayesian inference). The present-day toolkit of probabilistic methods offers varied software with distinct algorithms and assumptions for reaching global optimality. However, benchmark performance assessments of different software packages for the analyses of morphological data, particularly in the era of big data, are still lacking. Here, we test the performance of four major probabilistic software under variable taxonomic sampling and missing data conditions: the Bayesian inference-based programs MrBayes and RevBayes, and the maximum likelihood-based IQ-TREE and RAxML. We evaluated software performance by calculating the distance between inferred and true trees using a variety of metrics, including Robinson-Foulds (RF), Matching Splits (MS), and Kuhner-Felsenstein (KF) distances. Our results show that increased taxonomic sampling improves accuracy, precision, and resolution of reconstructed topologies across all tested probabilistic software applications and all levels of missing data. Under the RF metric, Bayesian inference applications were the most consistent, accurate, and robust to variation in taxonomic sampling in all tested conditions, especially at high levels of missing data, with little difference in performance between the two tested programs. The MS metric favored more resolved topologies that were generally produced by IQ-TREE. Adding more taxa dramatically reduced performance disparities between programs. Importantly, our results suggest that the RF metric penalizes incorrectly resolved nodes (false positives) more severely than the MS metric, which instead tends to penalize polytomies. If false positives are to be avoided in systematics, Bayesian inference should be preferred over maximum likelihood for the analysis of morphological data.

Harnessing machine learning to guide phylogenetic-tree search algorithms

The tree reconstruction game: phylogenetic reconstruction using reinforcement learning

Genetic Programming For Maximum-Likelihood Phylogeny Inference

Machine learning can be as good as maximum likelihood when reconstructing phylogenetic trees and determining the best evolutionary model on four taxon alignments

Reliable estimation of tree branch lengths using deep neural networks

A machine-learning-based alternative to phylogenetic bootstrap

Predicting locus phylogenetic utility using machine learning

A LASSO-based approach to sample sites for phylogenetic tree search

From Easy to Hopeless-Predicting the Difficulty of Phylogenetic Analyses

The Influence of the Number of Tree Searches on Maximum Likelihood Inference in Phylogenomics.

Evaluating the Performance of Probabilistic Algorithms for Phylogenetic Analysis of Big Morphological Datasets: A Simulation Study

Fast phylogeny reconstruction through learning of ancestral sequences

A tale of too many trees: a conundrum for phylogenetic regression

Constructing Phylogenetic Networks via Cherry Picking and Machine Learning

Genetic algorithm approaches for the phylogenetic analysis of large biological sequence datasets under the maximum likelihood criterion

Toward a semi-supervised learning approach to phylogenetic estimation

Estimating Genome-wide Phylogenies Using Probabilistic Topic Modeling

Phyloformer: Fast, accurate and versatile phylogenetic reconstruction with deep neural networks

Leaping through tree space: continuous phylogenetic inference for rooted and unrooted trees

Non-bifurcating Phylogenetic Tree Inference Via the Adaptive LASSO