Voxel‐level Classification of Prostate Cancer on Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Improving Accuracy Using Four‐Compartment Restriction Spectrum Imaging

Christine H. Feng,Christopher C. Conlin,Kanha Batra,Ana E. Rodríguez‐Soto,Roshan Karunamuni,Aaron Simon,Joshua Kuperman,Rebecca Rakow‐Penner,Michael E. Hahn,Anders M. Dale,Tyler M. Seibert

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.27623

IF: 4.4

2021-03-31

Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Abstract:BackgroundDiffusion magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is integral to detection of prostate cancer (PCa), but conventional apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) cannot capture the complexity of prostate tissues and tends to yield noisy images that do not distinctly highlight cancer. A four‐compartment restriction spectrum imaging (RSI4) model was recently found to optimally characterize pelvic diffusion signals, and the model coefficient for the slowest diffusion compartment, RSI4‐C1, yielded greatest tumor conspicuity. PurposeTo evaluate the slowest diffusion compartment of a four‐compartment spectrum imaging model (RSI4‐C1) as a quantitative voxel‐level classifier of PCa. Study TypeRetrospective. SubjectsForty‐six men who underwent an extended MRI acquisition protocol for suspected PCa. Twenty‐three men had benign prostates, and the other 23 men had PCa. Field Strength/SequenceA 3 T, multishell diffusion‐weighted and axial T2‐weighted sequences. AssessmentHigh‐confidence cancer voxels were delineated by expert consensus, using imaging data and biopsy results. The entire prostate was considered benign in patients with no detectable cancer. Diffusion images were used to calculate RSI4‐C1 and conventional ADC. Classifier images were also generated. Statistical TestsVoxel‐level discrimination of PCa from benign prostate tissue was assessed via receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves generated by bootstrapping with patient‐level case resampling. RSI4‐C1 was compared to conventional ADC for two metrics: area under the ROC curve (AUC) and false‐positive rate for a sensitivity of 90% (FPR90). Statistical significance was assessed using bootstrap difference with two‐sided α = 0.05. ResultsRSI4‐C1 outperformed conventional ADC, with greater AUC (mean 0.977 [95% CI: 0.951–0.991] vs. 0.922 [0.878–0.948]) and lower FPR90 (0.032 [0.009–0.082] vs. 0.201 [0.132–0.290]). These improvements were statistically significant (P < 0.05). Data ConclusionRSI4‐C1 yielded a quantitative, voxel‐level classifier of PCa that was superior to conventional ADC. RSI classifier images with a low false‐positive rate might improve PCa detection and facilitate clinical applications like targeted biopsy and treatment planning. Evidence Level3 Technical EfficacyStage 2

radiology, nuclear medicine & medical imaging